Answer:
I critical choice I made was to keep my bestfriend I did have around or to not keep her around anymore. It impacted my life because it was 6 years of being friends just gone by not talking anymore which can be ok for some relationships.But when you were always with them and then they start to change over time and shells are trying not to be stepped over all the time it gets tiring. Once it gets tiring because they don’t care it’s really no point in anymore.
Explanation:
Answer:
The film isn't as good as the book
Explanation:
You need to include the story it's talking about.
Answer:
a. Critical legal studies school of thought
Explanation:
As we can see in the text above, the narrator challenges and criticizes the dogmatic and inflexible rules applied to different situations. This is an inherent characteristic of the Critical legal studies school of thought, which was formed by a group of intellectuals who believed that the law has no neutralities and that it is formed from policies that must be questioned and challenged. These schools of thought preached revolt against the norms and standards described as correct in legal theories and practices.
Answer: B - putting key points at the end of the speech
Explanation:
an audience is more likely to remember what speakers present at the end of a speech than what they present in the speech body. -audience members recall what the speaker presents last better than the information contained in the body of the speech.
