1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lora16 [44]
3 years ago
12

What special authority did the bishop of Rome assume

History
2 answers:
ella [17]3 years ago
7 0
The special authority that the bishop of Rome assumed was the position of the pope.
myrzilka [38]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The pope

Explanation:

The special authority that the bishop of Rome assumed was that of supreme pontiff (<em>pontifex maximus</em>) or pope. The pope is the leader of the Catholic Church, and also the head of state of Vatican City. The current pope is Pope Francis. The pope, as bishop of Rome, is considered the succesor of Saint Peter.

You might be interested in
What were joseph stalin's goals for the soviet union, and what actions did he take to achieve them?
Naya [18.7K]
He focused on creating a model communist state, he abolished all privately owned farms and replaced them with collectives, he outlined several five year plans to direct industrialization.
5 0
3 years ago
The court ruled in this region’s favor in dred scott case
igomit [66]

Answer:

Explanation:

B

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these are Chinese inventions that were important for bookmaking? (4 points)
Helga [31]
I believe its A (:!!!!!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Research about the cause and effect of the passage 19th amendment to the US constitution and explain to your reader why it is im
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

The 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted American women the right to vote, a right known as women's suffrage, and was ratified on August 18, 1920, ending almost a century of protest. ... Anthony and other activists, raised public awareness and lobbied the government to grant voting rights to women.

Explanation:

The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the individual right to keep and bear arms.It was ratified on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights.

In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court affirmed for the first time that the right belongs to individuals, for self-defense in the home,while also including, as dicta, that the right is not unlimited and does not preclude the existence of certain long-standing prohibitions such as those forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing upon this right.

The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. Sir William Blackstone described this right as an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense and resistance to oppression, and the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the state. Any labels of rights as auxiliary must be viewed in the context of the inherent purpose of a Bill of Rights, which is to empower a group with the ability to achieve a mutually desired outcome, and not to necessarily enumerate or rank the importance of rights. Thus all rights enumerated in a Constitution are thus auxiliary in the eyes of Sir William Blackstone because all rights are only as good as the extent they are exercised in fact.

While both James Monroe and John Adams supported the Constitution being ratified, its most influential framer was James Madison. In Federalist No. 46, Madison wrote how a federal army could be kept in check by state militias, "a standing army ... would be opposed [by] a militia." He argued that state militias "would be able to repel the danger" of a federal army, "It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops." He contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he described as "afraid to trust the people with arms," and assured that "the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition".

By January 1788, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia and Connecticut ratified the Constitution without insisting upon amendments. Several amendments were proposed, but were not adopted at the time the Constitution was ratified. For example, the Pennsylvania convention debated fifteen amendments, one of which concerned the right of the people to be armed, another with the militia. The Massachusetts convention also ratified the Constitution with an attached list of proposed amendments. In the end, the ratification convention was so evenly divided between those for and against the Constitution that the federalists agreed to the Bill of Rights to assure ratification.

In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Supreme Court ruled that, "The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendments [sic] means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government."

In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment did not protect weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia."

In the twenty-first century, the amendment has been subjected to renewed academic inquiry and judicial interest. In Heller, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision that held the amendment protects an individual's right to keep a gun for self-defense. This was the first time the Court had ruled that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual's right to own a gun.

In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court clarified that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Second Amendment against state and local governments. In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare."

The debate between various organizations regarding gun control and gun rights continues.

3 0
3 years ago
Communist economic system?
Stella [2.4K]
The most important principle is that there is no private ownership of property would be allowed
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The legal tradition that kept women from owning property and holding public office came to the United States from
    15·1 answer
  • Chinese inventors were responsible for making the first
    8·1 answer
  • Edict of 1826 Ordehing the Derdbution of the
    14·1 answer
  • What excerpt is most directly related to which of these
    5·2 answers
  • HURRY I HAVE 20 MIN LEFT What were collcas?
    8·2 answers
  • Best gets brainliest:<br><br> Is the 2020 election rigged or not rigged?
    10·1 answer
  • What role did European colonies play in World War I?
    14·1 answer
  • Who is the first king of Nepal?​
    9·1 answer
  • The US government expected the Seminole to join the __________ Nation.
    14·2 answers
  • A graphic which has a box in the middle that says Branches of U.S. Government. There are three boxes surrounding the middle box.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!