Answer:
fossils provide solid evidence that organisms from the past are not the same as found today.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!!!!
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Answer A is incorrect as the data is not analyzing how many fish each lake has, but rather the pelvic score of the fish. Answer C is incorrect as the graph shows that the fish in Frog Lake are complete, and that there are 0 fish that have reduced or absent pelvic scores, therefore the fish don't have varying pelvic structures. Answer D is incorrect because the data is not analyzing the size of the fish and again is only analyzing the pelvic score of the fish. This being said by process of elimination the answer would be option B, as the fish in Bear Paw Lack lack complete pelvic spines but rather have reduced or absent pelvic spines.
Animals with bilateral symmetry can be divided equally along only one plane.
Hope this helps!
The given statement is True.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Charles Darwin developed the theory called Darwinism theory of evolution. The theory states that all the species of the organisms arises and developed through the small, inherited variations in the organisms that increase the individual ability to complete the survive and reproduce.
The individual species are not having identical traits that are passed from the generation to generation. The offspring are born that can survive, only the survive of the completion for resources will reproduce; he describes how the species can change in shape and character through the selective breeding.
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
The reasoning used is <u>inductive reasoning</u>.
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
The type of reasoning where the examples are used to derive conclusion it is called as inductive reasoning. The end is the theory or plausible. This implies the end is the piece of thinking that inductive thinking is attempting to demonstrate. Inductive thinking is likewise alluded to as 'circumstances and logical results thinking' or 'base up thinking' since it looks to demonstrate an end first. This is normally gotten from explicit occasions to build up a general end.
As the given examples quotes many examples of desert and then derives conclusion out of it, this is considered as example of inductive reasoning.
