Answer: The hidden curriculum
Explanation:
What is the hidden curriculum?
All the material and activities that are not written, not officially prescribed , and usually not related to the content of the lesson which includes values and perspective which children learn in school are all known as hidden curriculum. This can be said to be an informal curriculum.
Formal curriculum is the one where all the lesson, subjects and other school activities are prescribed and written down for the intention of teaching the children.
Hidden curriculum comprises of social ,cultural and unspoken academic communication to the learner's
For example children learn how to approach diversity which means how they can interact with other races different from theirs , how to talk to older people,how does a person carry themselves within the society all of these are not recognised as intended lessons but children do learn them through hidden curriculum.
Hidden curriculum can be of an assistant in improving learners ability to copy with the formal curriculum or they could be opposing ideas between the two also. For example students may be taught about embracing diversity especially racial diversity however if the experience opposes what they learn there is now no correlation between the two.
So the correlation between the formal and hidden curriculum is crucial to emphasize theorical issues practically.
Hidden curriculum helps students practice what they have learnt in school socially , culturally and through interaction with the environment that they are in .
Explanation:
I think it's the last option
is it?
:)
Unethical behavior may pay off in the short-term, but in the long-term it catches up and the consequences can be ... Ethical dilemma. is a situation requiring a decision about a course of action that, although offering potential benefits, may be considered unethical • May be no clear consensus on what is "right" or "wrong".
It is called the "s<span>elf-serving bias".</span>
The self-serving bias is
individuals' propensity to credit positive occasions to their own character yet
ascribe negative occasions to outer variables. It's a typical kind of
psychological predisposition that has been widely contemplated. At the point
when people dismiss the legitimacy of negative input, center around their
qualities and accomplishments however ignore their flaws and disappointments, they
are shielding their ego from danger and damage.
Hiii I'm good! Also there is not picture! lol
