1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kryger [21]
3 years ago
13

Read an excerpt from an analysis of Act III of Hamlet.

English
2 answers:
SpyIntel [72]3 years ago
7 0

In the end, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern betrayed Hamlet. So the answer is Things are not always what they seem.

mylen [45]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Things are not always what they seem.

Explanation:

William Shakespeare's tragedy "Hamlet" tells the revenge story of how a murdered king's son avenged the death of his father at the hands of his own uncle. King Claudius had not only murdered of his brother for the throne, but also took his wife as his own.

The characters of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were the two childhood friends of prince Hamlet. At first, they were loyal to him and acted for him, but in later scenes, we see them shift their loyalty to King Claudius. They began to be employed as spies by Claudius, for when he suspects Hamlet of doing things to hurt him.

In Act III scene iii, we find a disturbed Claudius after seeing the 'performance play' arranged by Hamlet. The obedience of Rosencrantz and Guilderstern in following Claudius' orders to send Hamlet away from him is a reflection of their seeming ignorance about what the real situation is. They are blindly following orders. Through these two characters, Shakespeare develops the theme of ignorance on their part, that things are not always what they seem to be shown.

You might be interested in
What effect does industrialization have on romantic thought
babymother [125]
It was the biggest historical and economic influence on 19 th century];
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help my sister.I am not good at English​
Irina18 [472]

Answer: 1. back, 2. up, 3. about, 4. in, 5. round, 6. out, 7. back, 8. round, 9. up, 10. out, 11. in.

Explanation: hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
I need help asap please no bots or links
kramer
C on the 2nd and third sentence
6 0
3 years ago
Why was Kennedy concerned about the use of nuclear weapons
Shalnov [3]

Concerned About Nuclear Weapons Potential, John F. Kennedy Pushed for Inspection of Israel Nuclear Facilities John F. Kennedy was a member of Congress when he first met Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion in 1951.

President John F Kennedy worried that Israel’s nuclear program was a potentially serious proliferation risk and insisted that Israel permit periodic inspections to mitigate the danger, according to declassified documents published today by the National Security Archive, Nuclear Proliferation International History Project, and the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies.  Kennedy pressured the government of Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion to prevent a military nuclear program, particularly after stage-managed tours of the Dimona facility for U.S. government scientists in 1961 and 1962 raised suspicions within U.S. intelligence that Israel might be concealing its underlying nuclear aims.  Kennedy’s long-run objective, documents show, was to broaden and institutionalize inspections of Dimona by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

On 30 May 1961, Kennedy met Ben-Gurion in Manhattan to discuss the bilateral relationship and Middle East issues. However, a central (and indeed the first) issue in their meeting was the Israeli nuclear program, about which President Kennedy was most concerned.   According to a draft record of their discussion, which has never been cited, and is published here for the first time, Ben-Gurion spoke “rapidly and in a low voice” and “some words were missed.”  He emphasized the peaceful, economic development-oriented nature of the Israeli nuclear project. Nevertheless the note taker, Assistant Secretary of State Philips Talbot, believed that he heard Ben-Gurion mention a “pilot” plant to process plutonium for “atomic power” and also say that “there is no intention to develop weapons capacity now.” Ben-Gurion tacitly acknowledged that the Dimona reactor had a military potential, or so Talbot believed he had heard.  The final U.S. version of the memcon retained the sentence about plutonium but did not include the language about a “pilot” plant and  “weapons capacity.”

7 0
3 years ago
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 10 points)
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Never make announcements in formal writing. Simply state the facts or your opinions.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the main conflict in Beowulf?
    11·1 answer
  • Amy Tan knows very little about language.<br> Group of answer choices<br><br> True<br><br> False
    9·2 answers
  • What does "The Goal is Zero" refer to?
    15·1 answer
  • Do i use a apostrophe for a plural of a word ends in a s
    8·1 answer
  • QUICKLY PLZ!
    7·2 answers
  • A) Make a list of words and expressions of joyful emotions and try to construct the sentences and speak infront of the class​
    8·1 answer
  • Review the underlined sentences on
    5·2 answers
  • In the story "what men live by" by Leo Tolstoy, what is an example of foreshadowing ? How is this example foreshadowing?
    5·1 answer
  • Punnett square
    9·1 answer
  • The setting of the poem emphasizes the idea that TheodoreA)took a long time to rescue the frail and sick childB)overcame geograp
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!