Answer:
Goodluck
Explanation:
Try not to stress and juat do your best.
Put these words in ABC order scrub, splash, three, splinters, scream, Shrek, sprayed, Stream, scrambled, stripes, Street, thrill
stepladder [879]
Answer:
i think it goes something like this:
scrambled, scream, scrub, shrek, shrink, splash, splinters, sprayed, spread, stream, stripes, three, thrilling
Explanation:
-
Answer:
- Para 23: "We got to their dwellings, where we saw they had built a hut for us with many fires in it"
Explanation:
As per the question, the 23rd passage would provide the most adequate supporting details to substantiate the claim that 'de Vaca's encounter with the native Americans might be the cause of Vaca's kind and generous treatment of them in his later life.' This is reflected through the descriptions in the passage like 'we got to their dwellings...in it' as it shows that this experience made him understand their life, culture, and values which they offer to others despite being indigenous. Thus, this not only supports but justifies the claim as well. Hence, <u>para 23</u> is the correct answer.
Answer: Because Sweet Nothings is an expository piece of writing.
Explanation:
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings presents evidence to support weight loss and refute weight loss because her writing is an expository piece of writing.
An expository piece of writing just as the name implies is one that exposes readers to a particular idea or topic. It’s purpose is to inform about and describe a particular subject or idea.
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings may have been expected to stick to a particular side of the subject, that is either present evidence that supports weight loss or the one that refutes weight loss.
Instead, she presented both because her writing is an expository piece informing her readers about the both the advantages and disadvantages of weight loss.
