40 minutes is 2/3 of an hour.
30 miles per hour x 2/3 hour = 20 miles.
30 minutes = 1/2 hour.
60 miles per hour x 1/2 hour = 30 miles.
Total = 20 + 30 = 50 miles.
You would have to do 6x2= 12 so it’s 12 outcomes
3.92
= 1.00 + 1.00 + 1.00 + 0.92
= 100/100 + 100/100 + 100/100 + 92/100
= 300/100 + 92/100
= 392/100
-------------------------------------------------------
392/100 = 196/50 = 98/25
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient between the variables h(height in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) is 0.202
Sample size n=40
Level of significane alpha = 0.01
Create null and alternate hypothesis as:
H0: r=0
Ha: r not equal 0
(Two tailed test at 1% significance level)
Sample r = 0.202
r difference = 0.202
test statistic t = data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb5ee/bb5eed1d7c8dfc4ab73744d8f19efd92a6a357a5" alt="\frac{r\sqrt{n-2} }{\sqrt{1-r^2} } \\=\frac{0.202(\sqrt{38} )}{\sqrt{0.9592} } \\=\frac{1.25}{0.9794} \\=1.271"
df =n-2 =38
t critical value for 0.01 and df =38 is 2.704
Since our test statistic lies below 2.704, we accept null hypothesis
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women