1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gre4nikov [31]
3 years ago
8

How the expansion of railroads was is South Carolina different when compared to the expansion of rail throughout the United Stat

es.
a. In South Carolina, standard time was introduced as a component of railroad expansion; in the rest of the country, the introduction of standard time was delayed until war world 2
b. railway expansion in South Carolina was slow due to the destruction of the civil war; railroad expansion in other areas was quicker because the railways escaped damage during the war.
c. Nationwide, railroad expansion concentrated on the introduction of iron rails to improve the introduction of iron rails to improve the system; in South Carolina, steel rails were used almost exclusively, though inferior.
d. South Carolina deferred railroad expansion in favor of an intrastate highway system; other parts of the country concentrated on rail expansion to connect distant regions of the nation.
History
2 answers:
Kryger [21]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is b) Railway expansion in South Carolina was slow due to the destruction of the civil war; railroad expansion in other areas was quicker because the railways escaped damage during the war.

The Civil War damaged the railroads in South Carolina. Hundreds of miles of track were worn out or destroyed during the war by the Union forces. During the war, the construction also ceased what made it slow compared to other states. It was only during Reconstruction that railroads became a priority again and were put back in order.

Sauron [17]3 years ago
6 0

i think the answer is b i hoped i helped

You might be interested in
In the Lochner v. New York case of 1905, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not
Sliva [168]

In the <em>Lochner v. New York</em> case of 1905, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not <u>impose limits on the number of hours that employees could work.</u>

Further details:

A law passed in 1895 in the state of New York mandated that bakery employees could not work more than 10 hours a day and not more than 60 hours in a week.  A bakery owner named Joseph Lochner filed suit against the state, claiming the law was unconstitutional.  At the time, the Supreme Court decision was based on the idea that such laws violated an employee's "freedom of contract."  The majority of justices saw such a right implicit in the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, thinking that if employees agreed to work a heavy number of hours it was their right to do so.

In the time since the Lochner case, the Supreme Court has gone in the other direction, allowing laws that impose reasonable restrictions on businesses.  An example would be <em>West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish </em>(1937), which upheld the constitutionality of a minimum wage law passed in Washington state.

7 0
3 years ago
1. How do Judah Ben Hur and Messala know each other prior to their reunion at
monitta

Answer:

Explanation:

Friends as boys and grew up together!

4 0
2 years ago
Paraphrase locke's definition of liberty
ipn [44]
"In the state of nature, liberty<span> consists of being free from any superior power on Earth."</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which group gained the most as a result of the Latin American revolutions?
rewona [7]

Answer:

The Patriots were the obvious winners in the Revolution; they gained independence, the right to practice representative government, and several new civil liberties and freedoms. Loyalists, or Tories, were the losers of the Revolution; they supported the Crown, and the Crown was defeated.

3 0
2 years ago
TRUE FACTS???? Any ideas???!!!!
likoan [24]
BEST DOG EVER???!!! UH YEAH I THINK SOOO!!!!!
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did the United States break diplomatic relations with Germany in 1917?
    13·2 answers
  • What prevents on branch of the government from becoming too powerful
    6·2 answers
  • the nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyle helped support the needs of the growing society in the Fertile Crescent
    8·1 answer
  • 12345678910<br> Why did Southerners argue states' rights were violated by abolition of slavery?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did Harriet Tubman and Fredrick Douglass do?
    9·2 answers
  • What invention did galileo create or imporve upon
    12·1 answer
  • Which it these people probably benefitted most from the construction of the Panama canal?
    14·1 answer
  • Why was it hard for carpetbaggers, scalawags, and African Americans to have a strong political alliance?
    14·1 answer
  • What was Italy MOST interested in during the negotiation of the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I?
    8·1 answer
  • discuss the Culture Wars of the 1980s. In what ways do these “wars” persist? Meaning, what parallels, or continuities, do you se
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!