One of the main differences between Northern and Southern states was the fact that Northern states had a much stronger allegiance to the federal government. Northern states were the ones that most supported the use of federal military force to enforce laws. On the other hand, Southern states believed that the federal government should not get too involved in states' affairs. This shows that Southern states believed in state autonomy, and believed that state's rights needed to be protected from the control of the federal government.
In June 1812, Napoleon<span> led his army into </span>Russia<span>. His army was made up of soldiers from the several nations now under his control. </span>Napoleon<span>expected a short </span>war<span>, to punish Czar Alexander I for his misbehavior in leaving the Continental System. </span>Napoleon<span> took around 600,000 men into </span>Russia<span>.</span>
Answer:
a comparative table where there are similarities between both sciences. Psychology and philosophy.
Explanation:
si estabas buscando una traducción, esta es tu ayuda, espero que esto pueda ayudarte
Answer:
In 1916, Marcus traveled to Harlem where the UNIA thrived. He advocated African Americans to be proud of their race and color and return to Africa to re inspire the culture their ancestors had.
Explanation:
Answer: I'm balanced I agree and disagree here is why,
Peter C. Perdue's China Marches West argues that the Qing dynasty's ability to break through historical territorial barriers on China's northwestern frontier reflected greater Manchu familiarity with steppe culture than their Chinese predecessors had exhibited, reinforced by superior commercial, technical, and symbolic resources and the benefits of a Russian alliance. Qing imperial expansion illustrated patterns of territorial consolidation apparent as well in Russia's forward movement in Inner Asia and, ironically, in the heroic, if ultimately futile, projects of the western Mongols who fell victim to the Qing. After summarizing Perdue's thesis, this essay extends his comparisons geographically and chronologically to argue that between 1600 and 1800 states ranging from western Europe through Japan to Southeast Asia exhibited similar patterns of political and cultural integration and that synchronized integrative cycles across Eurasia extended from the ninth to the nineteenth centuries. Yet in its growing vulnerability to Inner Asian domination, China proper—along with other sectors of the "exposed zone" of Eurasia—exemplified a species of state formation that was reasonably distinct from trajectories in sectors of Eurasia that were protected against Inner Asian conquest.