one advantage of lifetime terms for judges and justices, is to ensure their independence. It ensures that they are not thrown out of office for the decision they makes. However, one fundamental problem with this arrangements emanates from the humanity aspects of the justices, like an activist justice who is partisan. Supreme court justices should not serve life time terms but should serve definite terms to ensure that the adhere to the Constitution spirit .
Answer:
In his sermon "Sinners In the Hands of An Angry God", Rev. Jonathan Edwards used the word "gaping" to project an image of hell that is opened so wide that it will swallow anyone who sins and move away from the true God.
Explanation:
In his sermon "Sinners In The Hands of An Angry God", Jonathan Edwards gave a detailed description of what life is for those who stay away from the almighty God. He chooses to address this speech/ sermon to try to get the colonies back on tract to God and shy away from material things.
In this specific passage of the sermon, Edwards is describing in graphic details the fate of those who sin. He presents an image of hell "<em>gaping for them, flames gather(ing) and flash(ing) about them</em>" while "<em>the devil is waiting for them</em>". This parallel language structure projects an image of hell as enormous, daunting and dangerous, which it rightly is. But with the choice of words that he employs, he was able to instill a sense of fear in his listeners. This word is so effective as it <em>presents an image of hell as something that is open wide, welcoming them for an eternal life of suffering</em>. He verbally perfects showing an image that will frighten them and make then turn away from their sins.
No body knows for sure but most of the time its new orleans that is credited since its a place that suppourts lots of music
There was an issue in the Concord city election is the fake campaign that they made because they made themselves to look trustworthy but what they showed on Tv was only enthusiasm and many people followed them because of the emotion that these people generated.
Answer:
I find Andrew Jackson not guilty of all three charges. He committed no crimes against the indians; rather, he was working to keep them safe from the crimes the white settlers committed against them. ... The prosecution argued that Jackson influenced the removal of the indians, and that they had no say in their removal.
Explanation:
