Explain how the united states obtained florida

1 answer:

5 0

<span>U.S. Secretary of State John Quincy Adams and <span>Spanish minister Do Luis de Onis</span> signed the Florida Purchase Treaty in February 22nd, 1819. In which Spain agrees to cede the remainder of its old province of Florida to the United States. </span>

You might be interested in

When did Malcolm's attitude towards whites change?

Solnce55 [7]

Answer:

Malcolm's attitude changed towards whites.

Explanation:

Malcolm X went on a pilgrimage trip to Mecca in 1964. His experience with the whites changed his perception about them. He became a little less hostile towards them.

Malcolm came in contact with many white Muslims in Mecca. They were friendly and helpful towards him and treated him as an equal. So, he began to understand that, opposing to what Elijah Muhammad taught, racial problems were there, more because of the attitude than of color.

4 0

3 years ago

De-contextualizing is a good and important practice for biblical interpretation.

klasskru [66]

De-contextualizing is not good and important practice for biblical interpretation.

Contextualization is the practice of giving meaning as a method of analyzing the setting in which a message or action is carried out in the domain of Bible translation and interpretation. Contextualization is a method of analyzing Bible interpretations in connection to their cultural contexts.

So, the given statement is false.

Learn more:

brainly.com/question/2816100?referrer=searchResults

8 0

2 years ago

Why was China divided into multiple sphere of influence during the mid-19 century?

Len [333]

China was controlled by foreign nations , who dominate the ports in Shanghai.China was involved in a war called the "Opium War" between Great Britain, France and China which ultimately led to China's defeat. The consequence of their defeat was the lost of 50 of their ports which were called "treaty ports, meaning the ports were opened for foreign trade and residence.

5 0

2 years ago

What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods of direct democracy: Initiative, Referendum, and Recall?

Marina86 [1]

In the United States, where there is no direct democracy at the federal level, more than half of the states (and many municipalities) allow citizens to vote on initiatives, and the vast majority of states have mechanisms to promote initiatives or referendums. There are also community meetings (town meetings) and various institutions at the municipal level where citizens can interact with those responsible for administration in decision-making. The disadvantages of the initiatives is that any citizen could present it at any time and it should be analyzed and taken into account, which could take a long time.

Referendums are elections in which voters do not elect representatives but participate in taking direct participation on some important issue of the country. As advantages, it is highlighted that the Referendum can be used to solve problems of a political nature, or the improvement of the governmental image, when it is too deteriorated in front of the popular collective. Another aspect that touches a possible disadvantage, has to do with the circumstance that can be used as a strategy or political weapon to satisfy political interests or ambitions of power. It has also been argued that this figure has a meaning called "zero sum", that is, where the majority wins everything and the minority loses everything, originating a tyranny of majorities, that have answered one or several questions about a specific issue and that in the case at hand, has to do with the end of the armed conflict, questions that are closed and must be answered with the yes or no.
Revocation of mandate, revocation of mandate or recall referendum (in English, recall election), is a procedure by which citizens can cease their public office to an elected official, before the end of their respective period, by direct vote or by collection of signatures, depending on the geographic or population dimensions. Those who propose a revocation mechanism argue that these have a disciplinary effect on elected officials, in which elected representatives will make fewer unpopular decisions if this may cause them to be more likely to be subject to a recall campaign. However, the same argument is also used against the recall: opponents argue that the recall completely undermines representative government as it causes elected officials fear to make unpopular but necessary decisions. Another argument in favor of direct democracy is that it provides voters with a continuous opportunity to make a democratic decision about who governs them, since they not only have the opportunity to elect the people who represent them every two to six years, but also to maintain a degree of control over the decision of its duration in the position. However, its opponents maintain that the mechanism of revocation could be used irresponsibly, and that this could be used by the political parties as a political weapon against the rival of the holders. The assertion that the revocation mechanism is being used as a political instrument was made by many Democrats against activists of Republican parties in connection with the recall in California in 2003.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who was first assigned to write the Declaration of Independence Independence?

grandymaker [24]

Answer:

Original Rough Draft of the Declaration

Written in June 1776, Thomas Jefferson's draft of the Declaration of Independence, included eighty-six changes made later by John Adams (1735–1826), Benjamin Franklin 1706–1790), other members of the committee appointed to draft the document, and by Congress.

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago