1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iris [78.8K]
3 years ago
11

How does the Bush Doctrine differ from containment policy used during the Cold War?

History
1 answer:
gregori [183]3 years ago
5 0
The policies of containment used during the Cold War (which were the Truman Doctrine and the Eisenhower Doctrine) both used the economy to help out other countries to stop the spread of communism.  The Eisenhower Doctrine in addition used military forces.

The Bush Doctrine is different because it actually tried to implement democracy into other countries (such as the middle east) in an attempt to stabilize the government.
You might be interested in
Why were Japanese-Americans held in internment camps
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

they were held in camps because they thought they were spies

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
The first democratic government was the Roman Republic, T or F?
Vlad [161]
True. hope that helps.

7 0
3 years ago
After overthrowing a monarch the Romans established a form of government called a republic which which of these statements descr
andre [41]

The Roman Republic (Latin: Res publica Romana; Classical Latin: [ˈreːs ˈpuːb.lɪ.ka roːˈmaː.na]) was the era of ancient Roman civilization beginning with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom, traditionally dated to 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the establishment of the Roman Empire. It was during this period that Rome's control expanded from the city's immediate surroundings to hegemony over the entire Mediterranean world.

During the first two centuries of its existence, the Roman Republic expanded through a combination of conquest and alliance, from central Italy to the entire Italian peninsula. By the following century, it included North Africa, most of the Iberian Peninsula, and what is now southern France. Two centuries after that, towards the end of the 1st century BC, it included the rest of modern France, Greece, and much of the eastern Mediterranean. By this time, internal tensions led to a series of civil wars, culminating with the assassination of Julius Caesar, which led to the transition from republic to empire.

The exact date of transition can be a matter of interpretation. Historians have variously proposed Julius Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon River in 49 BC, Caesar's appointment as dictator for life in 44 BC, and the defeat of Mark Antony and Cleopatra at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC. However, most use the same date as did the ancient Romans themselves, the Roman Senate's grant of extraordinary powers to Octavian and his adopting the title Augustus in 27 BC, as the defining event ending the Republic.

Roman government was headed by two consuls, elected annually by the citizens and advised by a senate composed of appointed magistrates. As Roman society was very hierarchical by modern standards, the evolution of the Roman government was heavily influenced by the struggle between the patricians, Rome's land-holding aristocracy, who traced their ancestry to the founding of Rome, and the plebeians, the far more numerous citizen-commoners. Over time, the laws that gave patricians exclusive rights to Rome's highest offices were repealed or weakened, and leading plebeian families became full members of the aristocracy. The leaders of the Republic developed a strong tradition and morality requiring public service and patronage in peace and war, making military and political success inextricably linked. Many of Rome's legal and legislative structures (later codified into the Justinian Code, and again into the Napoleonic Code) can still be observed throughout Europe and much of the world in modern nation states and international organizations.


If This Helped Mark Me Brainlest Please!:)


5 0
3 years ago
1. ______ were sent to Kansas to tamper with the voting process
Rama09 [41]

The correct answer to number 1 is New Englanders.

Out of all the options listed, the only people who had the ability to vote were white adult males. This shows that the other 3 choices are incorrect. Along with this, the New Englanders went to tamper with the voting in hopes of making Kansas a free state. This would give free states more political power in the US Congress.

The correct answer to number two is False.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act actually caused more problems than it solved, as violence broke out between people for slavery and people against slavery. This era of fighting in the Kansas territory became known as "Bleeding Kansas."

7 0
3 years ago
The legacy of FDR was closest related to what previous President?
coldgirl [10]
What? Uhh. 
I guess Herbert Hoover. 
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which of the following languages were most books written before the renaissance
    11·1 answer
  • Black Codes were
    14·1 answer
  • Patrick Henry's speech was delivered for the purpose of ___.
    9·2 answers
  • How many people killed them self when hitler died?
    5·2 answers
  • Those in favor of anarchism believe government should have no ___ over them at all
    10·1 answer
  • 50PTS!! I just need a title for it this is my made up press release for summer school
    13·2 answers
  • What impact does the Internet play in citizen participation in government?
    9·1 answer
  • What would likely happen to a boulder in the path of a glacier
    6·2 answers
  • Help me with this anyone?
    11·1 answer
  • Study the map, and then use the drop-down menus to complete the statements.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!