Answer:
ye to be a great weekend to Suna Suna hai ki main road Bangalore on my email is strictly prohibited and square root of Plassey the best regards Michael sent via Micromax Canvas prints are you going the extra for your help and support the questions kariye dilo ar amar choto bhai ar khala to
Explanation:
ang pangamba yaggsgsyysys
The following are reasons for the perceived successes of the preparedness movement:
- it trained soldiers who became the main members of the officer corps.
- it forced improvements to the U.S. military.
- it made the U.S. more militaristic.
- it trained people to be better members of the workforce.
And reason For the failures of the Preparedness Movement
- it helped spark an arms race between major countries.
<h3>What is a Preparedness Movement?</h3>
In 1915, the Preparedness Movement was a campaign that began before the U.S.'s entry into World War I to increase U.S. military capabilities and to convince the U.S. citizens of the need for American involvement in the conflict and ongoing military preparedness.
Thus, the preparedness movement got the success because it trained people to be members of the workforce. It also helped lead the U.S to join the war.
Learn more about Preparedness Movement here:
brainly.com/question/26106259
#SPJ1
Answer:
Full Detailed Answer (Ps:I made it long and informative be patient and read it carefully).
The effects of war are widely spread and can be long term or short term.[2] Soldiers experience war differently than civilians, although either suffer in times of war, and women and children[citation needed] suffer unspeakable atrocities in particular. In the past decade, up to two million of those killed in armed conflicts were children.[2] The widespread trauma caused by these atrocities and suffering of the civilian population is another legacy of these conflicts, the following creates extensive emotional and psychological stress.[3] Present-day internal wars generally take a larger toll on civilians than state wars. This is due to the increasing trend where combatants have made targeting civilians a strategic objective.[2] A state conflict is an armed conflict that occurs with the use of armed force between two parties, of which one is the government of a state.[4] "The three problems posed by intra‐state conflict are the willingness of UN members, particularly the strongest member, to intervene; the structural ability of the UN to respond; and whether the traditional principles of peacekeeping should be applied to intra‐state conflict".[5] Effects of war also include mass destruction of cities and have long lasting effects on a country's economy.[6] Armed conflict has important indirect negative consequences on infrastructure, public health provision, and social order.[7] These indirect consequences are often overlooked and unappreciated.
:))))))))))))
