Answer:
c.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided it can be said that in this scenario it seems that the approach being illustrated in this scenario is a standardized strategy. This type of strategy in which the company in question treats the entire world as one big market that hold little to no variation, and therefore market their product exactly the same in every location. Which is exactly what Lilly's Beuty company is doing by selling the same products all around the world.
<span>B. dividend
</span>Which term is defined below?<span>an investment product that gives the buyer the right to buy or sell a commodity at a set price that is not subject to market fluctuations during a specified period of time
</span>
NOT:
A. bond
C. option
<span>D. warrant</span>
In order to decrease bias and magnify validity, researchers need to employ systematic sampling techniques when making observations. A technique that observers can use to systematically they record all of the given options.
<h3>What is Event Sampling ? </h3>
Event sampling is defined as this is the method used to collect all the data by observing participants for a definitive length of time.
<h3>What is Time Sampling? </h3>
Time sampling is defined as this is the process used to accumulate information by observing participants at a certain time interval to record if the behaviour or activity has occurred.
<h3>What is Situation Sampling? </h3>
Situation sampling is defined as this is the method of collecting the information by looking participants at many locations under different circumstances.
Learn more about the Sampling here: brainly.com/question/2717098
#SPJ4
NOTE: The given question is incomplete on the portal. Here is the complete question.
QUESTIONS: In order to reduce bias and enhance validity, researchers need to employ systematic sampling techniques when making observations. A technique that observers can use to systematically select what they record is:
A) All of these options
B) event sampling
C) time sampling
D) situation sampling
hi he is very busy but when i stop by tomorrow i'll ask him for you that sound good? lol
Answer:
School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 17, 1963, ruled (8–1) that legally or officially mandated Bible reading or prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. Whether required by state laws or by rules adopted by local school boards, such practices, the court held, violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from making any law “respecting an establishment of religion.” (The various provisions of the First Amendment, including the establishment clause, were gradually incorporated, or made binding on the states, by the Supreme Court in the first half of the 20th century through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.)
Explanation:
School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 17, 1963, ruled (8–1) <em>that legally or officially mandated Bible reading or prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. </em>Whether required by state laws or by rules adopted by local school boards, such practices, the court held that to violate the establishment clause of the <em>First Amendment,</em> which prohibits Congress from making any law <em>“respecting an establishment of religion.” </em>(The various provisions of the First Amendment, including the establishment clause, were gradually incorporated, or made binding on the states, by the Supreme Court in the first half of the 20th century through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.)
