cabot
began Quebec, the first permanent French colony.
Answer:
it is c most likely due to the reason that they were removed from it.
Answer:
Explanation:
By Tom Jawetz July 22, 2019, 4:45 am
Restoring the Rule of Law Through a Fair, Humane, and Workable Immigration System
Getty/Mario Tama
New U.S. citizens gather at a naturalization ceremony, March 2018.
OVERVIEW
Policymakers must break free of the false dichotomy of America as either a nation of immigrants or a nation of laws, and advance an immigration system that is fair, humane, and actually works.
PRESS CONTACT
For more information and updates on this topic, see CAP’s series: “Reframing the Immigration Debate.”
Introduction and summary
The immigration debate in America today is nearly as broken as the country’s immigration system itself. For too many years, the conversation has been predicated on a false dichotomy that says America can either honor its history and traditions as a nation of immigrants1 or live up to its ideals as a nation of laws by enforcing the current immigration system.2 Presented with this choice,3 supporters of immigration—people who recognize the value that immigrants bring to American society, its culture, and its economy, as well as the important role that immigrants play in the nation’s continued prosperity—have traditionally seized the mantle of defending America as a nation of immigrants.4 By doing this, however, rather than challenging the dichotomy itself, supporters have ceded powerful rhetorical ground to immigration restrictionists, who are happy to masquerade as the sole defenders of America as a nation of laws.5 The fundamental problem with this debate is that America is, and has always been, both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. Debates over a liberal immigration policy actually predate the start of the nation itself; they infused the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, America’s founding document.6
GET THE LATEST ON IMMIGRATION
Email
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Tanzania Tax History and England Tax History (Similarities)
1. Tanzania Tax History began with poll tax after independence, and England tax history strategy also began with Poll Tax.
2. Both Tanzania and England charged Income Tax from their population.
3. Tanzania and England both invalidated particular part of their Tax policy. For example, Tanzania rescinded excise duty in 1979, while England rescinded Poll tax in 1381.
4. Tanzania and England both re-introduce their once abolished tax, such as, Tanzania's excise duty in 1989, and England's Poll Tax in mid 1600s to late 1600s.
Contrast between Tanzania Tax History and England Tax History
1. Tanzania Tax history commenced in the 20th century, and that of England, commenced in 1377.
2. Tanzania assigned sales tax at specific point during their history (1969) however, England charged taxes like Hearth Tax, House Tax, and Window Tax at particular time a well.
3. Tanzania inaugurated Tax Commission in 1989, while England launched Parliamentary Reform Act-Electoral Registers (Voters Lists) in 1832.
