Answer: In a group of city-states, each city-state is independent and rules by its own king. No central power controlled all of the city-states. In an empire, consisting of a nation and the city-states and nations it has conquered, one ruler is in control.
Explanation: One has a king in where the other has just a ruler
The answer is false. Criminal cases focus almost completely on criminal issues.
In a time period where the majority of society were angry white people showed her physical courage. She knew what she was doing was going to get her in trouble yet she did it anyways because of the unjust treatment her race faced which can be seen as her moral courage. Also, it caught the world's attention & that attention was finally more focused on the treatment blacks endured. :)
The main advantage that the South had at the beginning of the war was its large army and well-trained generals. The Confederacy, from this perspective, appeared more capable of winning the war at the beginning of the conflict. Moreover, as most of the fighting was carried out in the South, they also had the advantage of knowing the territory.
I do not think that the South failed to exploit its initial advantages. The Confederacy fought extremely well during the early stages of the war. However, the North's advantages were finally just greater. The South relied on agriculture, which was rendered unviable during the war. Moreover, it had a much smaller population, and its workforce was destroyed after emancipation. All of these put the Confederacy in a particularly difficult position.
All member nations would have the right to establish trade in the congo
