James Otis made this statement, because he believed American colonists should be able to vote in Parliament. He believed equality for all Americans, including Whites and Blacks, which was very advanced for his time and is noted for being "a lawyer in Colonial Massachusetts, a member of the Massachusetts provincial assembly and an early advocate of the Patriot views against British policy that led to the American Revolution."
Explanation:
The word innovate has always generated, in human history, uncertainty, skepticism and even rejection by those who want to preserve the established order. After all, "innovating" consists of "altering something, introducing new features", so the innovator is a revolutionary who introduces changes that alter order and, therefore, introduces some initial disorder that, over time, will become a new order prevailing to be later altered and transformed again as a result of the introduction of a new innovation. Some examples help clarify this point.
The Ottoman Turkish Empire under Sultan Bayezid II closed to the possibility of experiencing the benefits of the introduction of the printing press. The Sultan, by means of an edict, prohibited printing in Arabic. Only in 1727 would the introduction of the first printing press be allowed in the lands of the empire, but under strict control, as evidenced by Ibrahim Müteferrika, whose production was controlled by religious scholars.
Müteferrika himself was aware that Europeans were advancing by leaps and bounds and the Ottoman Empire was left behind and that was due to the European political system that guaranteed rights and freedoms, and to rationalism and the scientific revolution. Instead, the progress (education and literacy) of the Turkish empire had been mortgaged due to religious fundamentalism and Islamic law. The secularization of society was a necessary step for the scientific revolution. However, we must also keep in mind that the printing press (and in our days twitter and internet) are innovations that totalitarian and dictatorial regimes such as North Korea and Cuba do not like, since they propagate ideas that can be considered as “ subversive ”and that threaten the integrity of the oppressive State along with its civil and military elite. It is easier and safer that knowledge is not dispersed but centralized in a single institution so that homogeneous and uncritical consciences can be formed. It is not surprising that totalitarian and authoritarian regimes immediately intervene in education as a way of earning the uncritical loyalty of the population.
<u>Shiva The Lord of Dance (Nataraja):</u>
Lord of Dance (Nataraja), As a symbol, Nataraja is an ingenious discovery. It combines in a single image Shiva's characters as creator, preserver, and destroyer of the universe and carries the Indian idea of the endless cycle of time.
<u>Traits:
</u>
- He dances inside a circular or cyclically closed arch of flames (Prabha mandala), which symbolically depict the universal fire that in Hindu cosmology builds everything and utilises everything, in cyclic existence or cycle of life.
- His legs are bowed, which proposes an energetic dance.
Are you asking who read his book? if so , I have
<span>The american general who would emerge as a national hero in the wake of the battle of new orleans was
</span>a. andrew jackson.
