I believe the correct lines are:
2. "…it creates an unsustainable pace of deforestation
that leads to mudslides…"
4. "…a pollutant that contributes directly to climate
change."
In this excerpt from “A Cooking Revolution: How Clean Energy
and Cookstoves Are Saving Lives” written by Chef Jose Andres, the lines from
the passage best support the author's concern with environmental activism are: "…it
creates an unsustainable pace of deforestation that leads to mudslides…"
and "…a pollutant that contributes directly to climate change."
These lines best support authors concern for environmental activism
as they describe the outcome of the cooking using firewood, coal and or dung –
deforestation and climate change, which later affect other realms of our lives (such as our health).
You move your legs and both are hobbies.
I think that the answer would probably be C, because often if it is like a teen or something they will not use grammatical correct sentences, the character does not always need to speak in short sentences, and the if the character is mad they probably will not speak politely. But I am not 100% sorry
Answer:Shaw's play explores aspects of language in a variety of ways. Higgins and Pickering study linguistics and phonetics, taking note of how people from different backgrounds speak differently. In Act Three, we see the importance of proper small talk in a social situation. And the play also reveals some of the powers of language: Eliza's transformation is spurred simply by Pickering calling her by the name Miss Doolittle, while Higgins' insults and coarse language, which severely hurt Eliza's feelings, show the potential violence of language. The play is most interested, though, in the connections between a person's speech and his or her identity. As we see in the beginning of the play, Higgins can easily guess where people are from based on their accent, dialect, and use of particular slang. How different people speak the same language thus reveals a surprising amount about their identity. However, Shaw also exposes how shallow and imprecise this conception of identity is, how it doesn't actually capture or represent the full person. After all, Eliza's way of speaking transforms over the course of the play. Eliza is able to change her identity simply by learning to talk differently.
Explanation:
because you need to make the MOST of your life and part of making the most of your life is having a job one finds fulfilling.
Hope this helps....
pst could i possibly have the brainliest answer? i hope so
