<span>Grains, as a whole, remain an
important part of the Russian economy. The types of grains produced,
however, vary with changes in demand and environmental conditions. Some
grains, such as oats, supported Russia economically in the past, but
grow in much smaller quantities. While grains export in highest
quantities from Russia, legumes follow close behind. Hardy and resilient
legumes, including potatoes and beets, prove ideally suited for
Russia's cold climates and sub-par soils. Potatoes thrive at Russia's
northernmost locations, primarily regions between 50 and 60 degrees
latitude. Russian potatoes provide citizens with food and nutrients, and
support vodka production as well. </span>
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the Articles of Confederation allowed the central government to declare war and sign treaties, since this was practically all the government could do under the Articles. </span></span>
Answer:
ans no (A ) the secret of life is finding Siddharth Gautam would say
Answer:
He was the President, Andrew Johnson, of the United States.
Explanation:
Andrew Johnson was the first US President to be impeached. He held the President office from 1865 to 1869.
Plan of Reconstruction:
This plan was prepared by the President Lincoln and after his assassination, Andrew Johnson wanted to execute this plan. This plan was made to add the Southern state into union in late nineteenth century on the condition if the 10 percent voter would swore an oath of allegiance to the union.
Why he was impeached:
The President Andrew Johnson was impeached due to the plan of reconstruction and impeachment trail was started when he violated the <em>Tenure of Office Pact </em>that restrict the President from dismissing appointed officials without taking permission from Congress. He dismissed the Secretary of War from the cabinet.
whether the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial applies to the states
The issue in the case was whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to jury trial in state prosecutions where sentences as long as two years may be imposed. In its ruling, the Supreme Court found that the right to a jury trial in criminal cases is within the 14th Amendment and so is applicable to the states
