This is simply defined to be an act of favour trading that is been pushed by a certain number of legislators in a country or a political situation without outrightly putting the task payers into total consideration; this selfishly for the legislators and politicians political gains only. In some cases, it can be also seen that two parties could easily pledge their mutual support, so as making the said bills attain a simple majority. Example is been seen in a vote that was carried out on behalf of a tariff which may be traded by a certain congressman for a vote from another congressman on behalf of an oil allocation to ensure that both acts will gain a majority.
The statement is true. In the case Feiner v. New York, Chief
Justice Fred Vinson discussed in his opinion that the Court has used the “clear
and present danger” principle. The chief justice believes that the arrest of
Feiner was necessary in order to protect “the interest of the community in
maintaining peace and order on its streets”.
