Answer: This is true and concerns <em>subjectivism</em>
Explanation: Subjectivism implies that moral reasoning and judgement come from the subjective feeling of individuals, and as such it is contrary to the so-called objective judgement of what moral values are, i.e, objectivism. Subjectivists, therefore, unlike objectivists, argue that judging ethical values cannot exist independently of individuals' feelings in the given particular circumstances, particular time, and all others, current opinion, education, level of knowledge of particular theme etc. Subjectivism rejects objective moral values as an illusion. So the sense of morality and moral judgement comes from individual feelings.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>The last step before writing a compare and contrast paragraph for reviewing the two sources is </em><em><u>composing a thesis.</u></em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
This is because the gathering of the supporting details has already been done for the comparison and the contrasting purposes. An outline is created at the beginning of comparing and contrasting two varied and distinct topics. Thus, the last step includes the composition of a thesis in an effective manner so that the reader can understand the entire thesis.
Answer and Explanation:
The phrase presents itself as a proverb expressing a meaning of equality between people who adopt the characteristics of a specific group of people and who must assume the archetype of that group, completely equaling its members. This means that when a person, of his own free will, wants to eat like normal people, that person is equaling normal people and therefore must take possession of this archetype and work just like them.
They are opposites so this should be
B antonyms
Answer:
1: A
2: C
Explanation:
Hope this helps! Have a good day! :D