1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
choli [55]
3 years ago
9

What was the most significant effect of the French and Indian War

History
1 answer:
Rzqust [24]3 years ago
6 0

The British victory in the French and Indian War had a great impact on the British Empire. Firstly, it meant a great expansion of British territorial claims in the New World. But the cost of the war had greatly enlarged Britain's debt.

You might be interested in
Which statement would President Lincoln most likely agree with?
skelet666 [1.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is C. Northerners would fight to keep America united.

Explanation:

The reality is that the Civil War did not start as a war on slavery, at least for the politicians and inhabitants of the North. For these, war was necessary to maintain the national unity of the United States in the face of the threat of secession from the southern states, who did believe that slavery was the main cause of the conflict. For this reason, President Abraham Lincoln did not refer to slavery or abolition in the first years of the war, since he knew that for many northerners this was not a relevant issue.

4 0
2 years ago
Help please and i will give brainliest
Studentka2010 [4]
Indian policy caused the President little political trouble because his primary supporters were from the southern and western states and generally favored a plan to remove all the Indian tribes to lands west of the Mississippi River.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of the march on washington for jobs and freedom program?
riadik2000 [5.3K]

The March was about civil rights, voting rights and racial equality, but it was also about the need for jobs and for jobs that paid a decent wage. The marchers wanted the federal minimum wage raised nearly 75 percent, from $1.15 an hour to $2.00 an hour. They also called for “A massive federal program to train and place all unemployed workers—Negro and white—on meaningful and dignified jobs at decent wages.”

In 1963, the unemployment rate averaged about 5.0 percent, which looks good compared to today’s 8.3 percent, but King and the other organizers wanted full employment and believed it was the federal government’s responsibility to provide it. If that meant hiring 3 million people, so be it; every American had the right to decent paid work if he wanted it. The economy had to be structured in a way that left no one behind.

The march’s key civil rights demands were met in 1964 and 1965 with passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. But the economic demands were never met. The minimum wage was raised to $1.25 in Sept. 1963, but it didn’t reach $2.00 an hour until 1974, by which time inflation had shrunk its value back to 1963 levels.

Today, with the separation of the 1 percent from the rest of us, and the government’s shrinking commitment to the well-being of the less fortunate, the economic disparities in America are worse than they were in 1963. Despite the legislative achievements of the 1960s, African Americans still suffer in fact from segregated housing, segregated schools, and segregated employment opportunities, all of which on average are worse than the housing, education and job opportunities available to whites.

We need a better, higher minimum wage; we need full employment; and we need a national commitment to equal economic opportunity.

6 0
3 years ago
What factors made Egypt a powerful and prosperous civilization?
strojnjashka [21]
The factors were mostly geographical. They had Nile to help them make food and have surpluses for trading and they were also protected from intrusions on all sides. One side had the desert, one had Nile, and one had the Sea, and nobody could just easily attack and destroy them.
6 0
3 years ago
Complete the analogy.<br><br><br> William Penn : Pennsylvania :: Lord Baltimore : ________.
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

Lord Baltimore : ________.

Lord Baltimore, also known as George Calvert, 1st Baron of Baltimore, was interested in the English colonization of the New World to establish a refuge for England's Catholic population. Calvert was instrumental in the British settlement of Avalon, located off of the coast of Canada's Newfoundland.

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPED ✨

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which amendment protects citizens from being tried twice for the same alleged crime (double jeopardy)?
    12·2 answers
  • What is one counter-argument to the premise that the wealth gap is a serious problem which needs to be addressed?
    6·2 answers
  • Why is Mecca significant to Islam? Select all that apply. (2 points)
    13·2 answers
  • If a power was not specified under the Articles of Confederation, who would be responsible for it? the federal government the le
    12·2 answers
  • In "Trail Mail!" which BEST describes the author's main point of view
    13·1 answer
  • how much time has passed between the development of the first stone tools and the development of agriculture?
    13·1 answer
  • The July Revolution occurred because the French constitution was rejected by which king? a. Louis-Philippe c. Charles X b. Napol
    9·2 answers
  • Your school is visiting a local bureau of the National Weather ServiceA student asks meteoralogist why hurricanes do not form in
    12·1 answer
  • 6. The year when basketball had become a major college sports?
    10·1 answer
  • What caused dissent among the Chinese between the first and second World Wars?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!