Mutations are avoided during replication because DNA polymerase is able to

If John F. Kennedy wrote an autobiography, what would be his focus

Sveta_85 [38]

I just took the quiz and the correct answer is B) the people and events that influenced his life

4 0

3 years ago

What kind act did Perrault perform for Buck?

damaskus [11]

Answer:

He takes care of Buck's feet.

Explanation:

Perrault and Buck are characters in the novel "The Call of the Wild" by author Jack London. Buck is a brave dog that, after being stolen from his home, is sold to be a sled-dog. One of the men who buy Buck is Perrault, the sled-driver who works as a mailman, delivering dispatches in a rough and cold region. Buck's life changes completely. Once a domestic dog, living comfortably and unaware of the harsh world, Buck was now a true survivor. He quickly learns how to defend himself and how to be a leader. However, he is not a husky; he belongs to a domestic breed whose feet are not meant for snow-covered ground. In an act of kindness, Perrault begins to rub Buck's feet every night to make him feel better. Also, to protect his feet until they grow accustomed to the trail, he makes footgear out of his own moccasins for Buck to wear. This information is provided in chapter 3 of the novel:

Buck's feet were not so compact and hard as the feet of the huskies. His had softened during the many generations since the day his last wild ancestor was tamed by a cave dweller or river man. All day long he limped in agony, and camp once made, lay down like a dead dog. Hungry as he was, he would not move to receive his ration of fish, which Francois had to bring to him. Also, the dog-driver rubbed Buck's feet for half an hour each night after supper, and sacrificed the tops of his own moccasins to make four moccasins for Buck. This was a great relief, and Buck caused even the weazened face of Perrault to twist itself into a grin one morning, when Francois forgot the moccasins and Buck lay on his back, his four feet waving appealingly in the air, and refused to budge without them. later his feet grew hard to the trail, and the worn-out footgear was thrown away.

4 0

3 years ago

What/How do the fires in California have effect you life?

Alexandra [31]

Answer:

Due to increasing fire size, frequency, and susceptibility to beetle outbreaks and drought driven mortality, forest biodiversity and composition is changing rapidly. Changes in vegetation structure alter important aspects of fire regimes (e.g., magnitude, frequency, seasonality), and these changes affect the management of biodiversity, groundwater management, forestry, recreation, as well as human safety.

Explanation:

5 0

4 years ago

Which is a more apt antonym of miserly : spenthrift or generous ?

frosja888 [35]

The answer is Generous
spendthrift is someone that spend to much money

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

WILL GIVE BRAINLEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sindrei [870]

Answer:

I think, in some ways, the author does. However, becasue there is no real opposition that the author lays out, and because of other reasons, I don't think this is a valid arguent. For a more in-depth analysis, read the explanation.

Explanation:

It hosestly depends on what you would consider the 'other side' of this debate, and what would constitue as a valid argument. If you are looking at the viewpoint of "Yes, this is a valid argument," then these examples and opinions make sense.

A) "Teenagers can learn from having to maintain a vehicle." Yes! Teenagers learn via doing. Not everyone is a visual learner.

B) "...responsible drivers have the wide-open road in front of them and endless opportunitites." Well, I wouldn't word this using endless, per se, but sure. Responsible drivers don't need monitoring. I can get behind that.

C) Read the third Paragraph. Boom! A whole lot of explanation for yeah! Sure! Valid!

If you are looking at the viewpoint of "No, this is not a valid argument," then these examples and opinions make sense.

A) There is a slight Slippery Slope fallacy hidden in this argument. Paragraph four says this: "This lesson can carry over into school, work and pesonal life." While this could be true, the sentiment right before it is part of a Slippery Slope fallacy--or just about. There are many reasons to be responsible, and not being allowed to drive at 15 will not crash a student's entire life.

B) In P. 5, yes. Maturity certainly determines if one is 'old' enough to drive. However, how does one measure maturity? There is no test. That's why the legal driving age is 16, just in case some one isn't mature enough to drive without an adult in the car with them.

C) "Those who are not responsibel enough..." Yes, punishment in this context does what? Doesn't let them drive, sure. How do you...enact that into law? 'Oh, if we don't deem you mature enough you will get your liscense revoked. WE determinte if you are mature enough.' That certainly sounds like it would be abused.

D) The very last sentence is very...affronting. It tells me what not to do. People don't like being told what to do or not do, they like to form opinions and act on them. You can purseude them, but outwardly telling them 'Don't do this' will throw any valid argument out of the window.

7 0

4 years ago