In the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson claims that Governments are instituted among men to secure their God-given unalienable rights, with the consent of the governed. When a government becomes destructive to this, it is the right and duty of men to take it down and establish a new one that fulfill the mentioned purpose.
These claims impact his overall argument because he is trying to prove that the English government of the thirteen colonies doesn't fulfill its duties anymore, so they are entitled to break away from it.
Hmm...I'm not really sure as to what your question refers to. Maybe rephrase it a little so it's easier to understand? =)
<span>"Was what the writer said worthwhile".
</span>
Answer:
uh- 76?
Explanation:
i only read the first sentence and the answer to that one is yes
Answer:
Presidential reputations rise or fall with gross domestic product. The state of the economy can determine if presidents are re-elected, and it shapes historical memory of their success or failure.
In the news media, we often use the handover of power as the time for assessing the economic record of the departing president. (I’ve done it myself recently.) Some economists have predicted that the Trump administration could create the next recession or financial crisis. And scholars have studied the relative economic conditions generated by Republicans and Democrats for predictive meaning (Democrats have done better since World War II, they found).
But the reality is that presidents have far less control over the economy than you might imagine. Presidential economic records are highly dependent on the luck of where the nation is in the economic cycle. And the White House has no control over the demographic and technological forces that influence the economy
