The british won the war but the boers won the ensuring peace so go with the british :)
Answer:
In late 19th century/early 20th century, the United States had become a global power with interests - and investments - around the globe. It was a new status and it had was symbolized by the victory in the Spanish-American War. The US was strong, modern and industrialized and it could support a powerful army and the powerful navy advocated by naval strategist Alfred Thayer Mahan. The "big stick diplomacy" meant that the US could impose its preferred outcomes abroad by military force if it wanted to. It translated into military interventions in the Caribbean to bring order in troubled nations and prevent European intervention, anathema to the Monroe Doctrine.
Explanation:
Answer:
Sixty-five years after Elizabeth Cady Stanton organized the landmark women's rights convention in Seneca Falls, N.Y., the first national demonstration for women's suffrage took place in Washington, D.C. On March 3, 1913, the day before Woodrow Wilson's presidential inauguration, 8,000 women gathered to march down ...
Explanation:
Sixty-five years after Elizabeth Cady Stanton organized the landmark women's rights convention in Seneca Falls, N.Y., the first national demonstration for women's suffrage took place in Washington, D.C. On March 3, 1913, the day before Woodrow Wilson's presidential inauguration, 8,000 women gathered to march down ...
Hello. You forgot to put the text to which this question refers. The text is:
The great idea in Article V is that change requires two elements: consensus and necessity. There must be substantive national agreement, as well as agreement in most of the states, that an urgent problem exists that cannot be remedied by the courts, legislatures or Congress, and which can be solved only if the Constitution is changed.
—Mary Frances Berry, The New York Times, September 13, 1987
Answer:
Amending the Constitution
Explanation:
The above text reflects on how the constitution changes through amendments should be. the author of the text shows that the amendments should only be approved when there is a mutual agreement between several factors that prove and justify that there is a problem in society that is impossible to be solved by courts, legislatures or Congress. Furthermore, this problem needs to be solved with such urgency that only an amendment to the constitution, that is, a modification of the constitution can solve it. If this condition were not proposed, the constitution would run the risk of being a set of temporary laws with little or no real influence.
