1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elan Coil [88]
4 years ago
10

Do you agree or disagree with this statement: “Representative democracy works better than direct democracy in large countries.”

Defend your answer.
History
1 answer:
pav-90 [236]3 years ago
3 0
I agree because a smart representor will base his oppinion off his state but its ultimetly up to him. Lets say 1/2 the country are idiots (not saying there are) but if so then they would most likely vote for the wrong person but you must qualify to be a representor to decide the fate of the presidency.
You might be interested in
Which action was greatly needed once American soldiers returned home from Vietnam? a. Many needed a rehabilitation program to re
nika2105 [10]

The first alternative is correct (A).

A war is a terroir scenario, where the soldiers go through very difficult times. Many lose friends, see the suffering of people, children, anyway. That way, no matter how psychologically strong a soldier is, his emotional state is shaken.

The Vietnam War itself caused many traumas, as it was a very violent war with many deaths and mutilations. In this way, soldiers who have returned alive have gone through many psychological dramas, alcohol vices, drugs, to the point of needing rehabilitation programs.

4 0
3 years ago
Given the radius of a circle is 15.5cm, what's the volume of the circle​
Vikki [24]

Answer:

240πcm^2, or 753.982236862, 754cm^2

Only use rounded answer if told to

Explanation:

The volume of a circle is also its area, the area of a circle is pi*r^2

15.5^2 = 240.25, it is 240π, or if you want exact measurements, 753.982236862, or about 754cm^2

7 0
3 years ago
Opinions on united states v. fields?
ohaa [14]

The United States v. Fields case ended up on a federal death sentence imposed on Fields for commitig a federal capital offense.

This sentence was made largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could predict Fields would be a risk to society in the future.

The problem here is that the psychiatrist issued this crucial testimony without doing any testing or offering any objective empirical data whatsoever.

To this day, there's still much debate involving how a Court can determine risk to society or future violence from an individual, in a safe and reliable manner that reaches necessary standards for a case of such magnitude assessing death penalty.


Hope this helps!


6 0
3 years ago
Why is comparative mythology important to the study of myths?
MatroZZZ [7]
Because that is how people used to explain things
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the German acts of aggression in March 1938, September 1938, March 1939, and September 1939 during World War 2?
s344n2d4d5 [400]
Invasion of poland was one of them
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Personal rights are either substantive or procedural in character. True or False
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following scenarios is an example of a monopoly?
    6·2 answers
  • What factor reflects the ‘cost of money’? The ‘cost of money’ is reflected in the _______.
    8·2 answers
  • How old was martin luther king
    9·1 answer
  • HELP! Experimentation and direct observation can prove that some of what the ancients believed was false.
    14·1 answer
  • Women in the British colonies were not allowed to
    12·1 answer
  • Who is to blame for the violence that happened at the homestead strike of 1892?
    11·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP UNIT QUIZ
    6·1 answer
  • How did world war 1 become a global war?
    7·2 answers
  • Where did the Vandals migrate to and how they affected them.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!