1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
user100 [1]
3 years ago
5

Which factors contributed to the severe damage that new Orleans experienced as a result of hurricane Katrina

History
2 answers:
jasenka [17]3 years ago
8 0
One of the factor that <span>contributed to the severe damage that new Orleans experienced as a result of Hurricane Katrina was: (</span><span>C) Many of the cities parishes were built on land that was below sea level.
The hurricane also affect the direction of the wind flow that came from the sea, so for the cities below sea level, they have to face the both the danger of the moving hurricane and the floods that came from the sea.</span>
ikadub [295]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B, C, and D are your answers! if you have anymore questions just ask! happy i could help

                                                     

You might be interested in
What two economic impacts did the 9/11 attacks have?
myrzilka [38]
Twin towers in New York
4 0
2 years ago
What differences separated the Soviet Union from the United States in the
nexus9112 [7]
The answer is C.The United States has a capitalist economy; the Soviet Union had.
4 0
3 years ago
How many Americans were killed when the USS Maine exploded?
Sliva [168]

Answer:

266

Explanation:

On February 15, 1898, the American battleship Maine exploded while sitting in the Havana harbor, killing two officers and 250 enlisted men. Fourteen of the injured later died, bringing the death toll to 266.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Helppppppppppppppppppp
vova2212 [387]

Explanation:

How many pages or paragraphs do you want this task to be

4 0
2 years ago
why is it in the presidents best interest to nominate several federal judges favored be most senators?
slamgirl [31]
During the summer of 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia established equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives.  Called the “Great Compromise” or the “Connecticut Compromise,” the unique plan for congressional representation resolved the most controversial aspect of the drafting of the Constitution.  

In the weeks before the Constitution’s framers agreed to the compromise, the delegates from the states with large populations argued that each state’s representation in the Senate should correspond to the size of the state.  Large-state delegates promoted James Madison’s Virginia Plan, the document that was the basis for several of the clauses in the Constitution.  Under this plan, the Senate and the House would base their membership on the same proportional “right of suffrage.”   That is, the number of senators in each state would be determined by its population of free citizens and slaves.  Large states, then, stood to gain the most seats in the Senate.  As justification for this advantage, delegates noted that their states contributed more of the nation’s  financial and defensive resources than small states, and therefore, required a greater say in government.

Small-state delegates hoped to protect states’ rights within a confederate system of government. Fearing the effects of majority rule, they demanded equal representation in Congress, as was practiced under the Articles of Confederation and assumed in William Paterson’s New Jersey Plan.  In fact, some framers threatened to withdraw from the convention if a proportional representation measure passed.  

Other delegates sought a compromise between large-state and small-state interests.  As early as 1776, Connecticut’s Roger Sherman had suggested that Congress represent the people as well as the states.  During the 1787 convention, Sherman proposed that House representation be based on the population, while in the Senate, the states would be equally represented.  Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate except in matters concerning money.  The convention’s grand committee reported his motion, with some modifications, to the delegates early in July.  Madison led the debates against Franklin’s measure, believing it an injustice to the majority of Americans, while some small-state delegates were reluctant even to support proportional representation in the House.  On July 16, delegates narrowly adopted the mixed representation plan giving states equal votes in the Senate within a federal system of government.

Once delegates established equal representation in the Senate, they needed to determine how many senators would represent each state.  State constitutions offered some guidance.  Several states designated one senator per county or district, while in Delaware there were three senators for each of the three counties.  Convention delegates did not refer to the state precedents in debate, however.  Instead, they seemed to take a common-sense approach in deciding the number of senators.

According to constitutional commentator Joseph Story (1779-1845), few, if any, delegates considered one senator per state sufficient representation.   Lone senators might leave their state unrepresented in times of illness or absence, and would have no colleague to consult with on state issues.  Additional senators, moreover, would increase the size of the Senate, making it a more knowledgeable body, and better able to counter the influence of the House.   On the other hand, a very large Senate would soon lose its distinctive membership and purpose, and actually decrease its ability to check the lower house or to allow senators to take personal responsibility for their actions.

Given these considerations, delegates had a limited choice regarding the number of senators.  During the convention, they briefly discussed the advantages of two seats versus three.   Gouverneur Morris stated that three senators per state were necessary to form an acceptable quorum, while other delegates thought a third senator would be too costly.  On July 23, delegates filled in the blank in the proposal offered by Morris and Rufus King: “That the representation in the second branch consist of _____ members from each State, who shall vote per capita.” Only Pennsylvania  voted in favor of three senators.  When the question turned to two, Maryland alone voted against the measure, not because of the number, but because Martin disagreed with per capita voting, which gave each senator, rather than each state, one vote.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did advancements made by Gupta scholars spread from India across Asia? A.through an expansive trade network B.through the Ar
    10·2 answers
  • Help!!!! PLEASE!!!! Which of the following projections would be best for a map of the South Pole and Antarctica?
    14·2 answers
  • Read the information below: During the 1820s and 1830s, many people settled in Texas and California. The territories were part o
    10·2 answers
  • Who became king of France after Napoleon was exiled?
    8·1 answer
  • How do the borders of the Shang and Zhou dynasties compare with those of present-day China?
    5·1 answer
  • ancient egypt's middle kingdom occurred between 2000 bce and 1650 bce. according to the map below, the persian empire was in exi
    9·2 answers
  • Which was one environmental achievement of the Nixon administration?
    12·1 answer
  • Answer this question and if u get it right you will get a Brainliest , Also you will get 50 points :) , If u scam me i will repo
    6·2 answers
  • WHAT WAS HOOVER'S VIEWS ON GOVERNMENT?
    11·1 answer
  • How did Islam spread throughout the various regions of Africa? How were African religious beliefs affected by Islam?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!