Why do historians need to be careful about being unbaised when presenting historical facts?

2 answers:

Klio2033 [76]3 years ago

4 0

The historians could be wrong without proper proof to back up their so-called "facts". Therefore, they would need to study and know what they're talking about, before presenting their statements as facts.

scoundrel [369]3 years ago

3 0

If a historian is biased to one side of a historical debate, he/she will present it in a way that makes it better than the other side, even if it isn’t

You might be interested in

What was one use of tax money in the Roman Republic?

Nataly [62]

The 4th one is right

4 0

4 years ago

How did word of the Holocaust spread beyond Germany, and how did people in other countries react to the news?

san4es73 [151]

Answer: I would say through journalism as it was a new thing in that time.

Explanation:

By summer 1941, British intelligence agents were listening in on classified German radio transmissions that described systematic mass murders in Lithuania, Latvia, and later Ukraine. News also came from the Soviets. On August 14, 1941, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill summarized the news in a broadcast to the public.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The peace treaty that ended the war was called the Treaty of .

baherus [9]

Answer:

Versailles

Explanation:

it brought world war 1 to an end

5 1

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers