Answer: The recessionary gap will be equal to 1 trillion yen divided by 2.5 or 0.4 trillion yen
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that GDP gap of 1 trillion yen and the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.60. Also, to close the GDP gap, the prime minister has decided to increase government spending. This means that there will be a recessionary gap because the actual GDP will be less than the potential GDP.
Fir the economy to be brought to its potential GDP, the spending of the government will give a stimulus to the economy. Since MPC is 0.6, the multiplier will be:
= 1/1-MPC
= 1/1 - 0.6
= 1/0.4
= 2.5
The government spending will then increase in order to close the recessionary gap as:
∆Y = ∆G × Multiplier
100 = ∆G × 2.5
∆G = 100/2.5
∆G = 40
Therefore, the recessionary gap will be equal to 1 trillion yen divided by 2.5 or 0.4 trillion yen.
Answer:
Date Account Titles Debit Credit
Oct 1 Cash $16,800
Common Stock $16,800
Oct 2 No journal entry - -
Oct 3 Office Furniture $2,500
Accounts Payable $2,500
Oct 6. Accounts Receivable $3,
400
Service Revenue $3,400
Oct 27 Accounts Payable $1,100
Cash $1,100
Oct 30 Salaries Expense $2,650
Cash $2,650
If the cutting edge sells ice skates. total sales are $845,000, total variable expenses are $245,050 and total fixed expenses are $302,000. the variable expense ratio is: 29%.
<h3>Variable expense ratio</h3>
Using this formula
Variable expense ratio=Total variable expense /Total sales
Let plug in the formula
Variable expense ratio=$245,050/ $845,000
Variable expense ratio=0.29×100
Variable expense ratio=29%
Therefore If the cutting edge sells ice skates. total sales are $845,000, total variable expenses are $245,050 and total fixed expenses are $302,000. the variable expense ratio is: 29%.
Learn more about variable expense ratio here:brainly.com/question/24161829
#SPJ1
Answer:
False
Explanation:
An excise tax is tax levied on some specific goods. It is an indirect tax because it is not levied on customers.
Excise tax would increase the cost of supplying alcohol. This would reduce the supply of tax. A decrease in the supply of tax would increase the price of alcohol