Answer:
System, structure
Explanation:
Structuration theory was proposed by Giddens. It is sociology concepts that work on human behavior. It is the synthesis of agency and structure that is called the "duality of the structure". This theory is to describe the acknowledgment about the interaction of meaning, value, standard power instead to describe the structure and function of an individual's facial expression. Acc. to the Giddens, the individuality of the person has been affected by the structure. The structure and functions are maintained by the exercise of agency. This theory focuses on human being social behavior.
Answer: The popular students in Mr. Henderson's class can be classified as EXTRAVERTED.
Explanation: Extraverted is an alternative form of saying Extroverted. This mean that an individual is said to be Extraverted when one they are outgoing (talkative, friendly, and social, especially with respect to meeting new people easily and comfortably) sociable, and concerned with outer affairs.
From this definition, it can be deduced that those students are Extraverted. The Question says "enjoy being around others and are friendly and lively" which is a quality of an extravert.
Answer:
The correct answer is : one-to-one relationship
Explanation:
This case gives an example of a one-to-one relationship, which expresses one record in a set of information that is associated with one and only one record in another set. It happens when the information given can be linked with only one option in another table of information and vice versa. The element of one set is paired or matched with exactly one element of the other set.
I agree with the answer above, A and B are definititly not true, and D was abit if-fy. C and E however were pretty clear choices to be right answers. So I would go with C and E.
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
