Answer: you need to say do not enter.
Answer:
The answer to your question is C.
The explanation for Option C:- raise an objection to his own opinion and counter that argument is:
On May 31, 1988 President Ronald Reagan addressed the students and faculty at Moscow State University (MSU). Although previous presidents desired such an opportunity, no other U.S. president except Richard M. Nixon had stood east of the Berlin Wall and spoken directly to the citizens of the Soviet Union. That Reagan would have such an opportunity was highly unlikely. Reagan appeared to be an implacable foe of the Soviet Union, previously calling it an "evil empire," describing it as "the focus of evil in the modern world," and accusing the Soviet "regime" of being "barbaric."
Thus, Reagan equated freedom with progress. Specifically, his thesis argued that human rights equal individual freedom; freedom equals individual creativity; individual creativity equals technological progress. The essence of the argument in Reagan's MSU address can be summarized as it follows:
There is a revolution taking place. It is spreading around the globe.
Hope this helps! :3
Hello. You did not provide the passage to which the question refers, which makes it impossible for me to give you an exact answer, but to help you, I will show you how to find the subject of a passage, which will guide you to the right answer.
The details of an excerpt are the phrases that support the main theme of the excerpt. For that, you will have to read the entire text and interpret the subject that is presented in this excerpt. Those subject is the answer to your question.
For example, if the excerpt shows confusing rules when the character questions the insasatex and unbelief of those rules, it means that the theme is "The rules of life do not always make sense".
<span>Nadine Gordimer was a South African writer, political activist and recipient of the 1991 Nobel Prize in Literature. She earned the nobel prize due to her writing on apartheid in post colonial Africa.</span>
Answer:
Trade is important to the world economy, then, both because it allows us to get things we can't produce at home and because it allows each country to make what it is best at. This allows more people to have more goods and services than would otherwise be possible.
Explanation:
The answer is an explanation in itself. I hope this helped
