Federalist
AntiFederalist
Opinion about Constitution
They were Pro Constitution
They were Anti Constitution
Where did supporters live?
Urban Areas
Rural Areas
Bill of Rights
They were Pro Bill of Rights but didn’t find it necessary
They were Pro Bill of Rights but they wanted it to support the Constitution
Founding Fathers
Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, George Washington
Economic Ideas
They supported a national bank
They supported more Small Businesses and Farms
View on state's power
Believed the Federal should have the most power
Believed the State should have the most power
Some obstacles which prevents third party candidates from winning elections;
Not a well known name, not enough money for campaigning, minority of voters go outside democrats or republicans. However, most of all is the ability to withstand your opponents and go the distance.
Answer:
;)
Explanation:
Prewriting allows you to organize your ideas and prepare to begin writing. Drafting is when you will actually write your essay, and revising is when you will go back, fix your mistakes, and change small things to perfect your essay.
Answer:
<u>Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. </u>And this reality could be <u>social, political or religious.</u>
Explanation:
I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.
- France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. <u>To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. </u>The question is: why this conception worked in France? <u>Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.</u>
- On the contrary, in England, <u>the king was subjected to the Parlament. </u>However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings <u>followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). </u>This idea attests that <u>a king has duties with its people,</u> and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.
The first 3 articles of the Constitution establish the 3 branches of government with specific powers. Executive (headed by the president), Legislative (Congress), and Judicial (Supreme Court)
Article 1 - created the Legislative branch
Article 2 - created the Executive branch
Article 3 - created the Judicial branch
