1. The Northern colonies were a refuge for religious dissenters, many of whom immigrated in families. Fewer families migrated to the Southern colonies because the South attracted people who were seeking economic prosperity.
2. Many people came to the Southern colonies from England because of limited opportunities in the old country. The English countryside was nearly fully occupied by farmers, but the American South had vast expanses of uninhabited, uncultivated land. Immigrants also came from Germany, Scotland and Ireland, and some of these people moved inland, away from the English, especially if they could not obtain fertile land near the coast. These inland Southern colonists faced hardship living in Indian country and wilderness.
3. Colonists in the Southern colonies experienced epidemics of yellow fever and malaria, which shortened life <span>expectancies</span>. These disease outbreaks did not plague the North as much. Life expectancy was even shorter for slaves abducted from Africa or other places. On some of the harsher plantations, slave life expectancy was only seven to nine years.
No he didn’t think that they were equals. When he was president he passed a lot of legislation that hurt natives including the removal act which led to the trail of tears. He believed that white people had a god given right to the Indians land
Answer:
c
Explanation:
America surely cast its cultural imperialism all over the globe. This has been possible mainly because of the the fact that the American styles in fashion, food, and entertainment dominate the global markets.
The American companies in science and technology , social networking, search engine and mobile phones have customers all over the globe. Food giants like McDonald, Domino's and KFC have outlets in most of the countries of the world. Hollywood movies gross revenues are in billion dollars because they are watched world wide. So, it can be rightly said that American companies dominate the world in most of the major fields of life.
This argument is based on <span>The linguistic relativity hypothesis
According to </span><span>The linguistic relativity hypothesis, the language that people use in our day to day life will heavily influence the view/cognition of the speaker.
For example, if a person tend to use high-energy language, that person will be more likely to feel optimistic in facing the problem in front of him/her</span>
It's false. The mid-nineteenth century is the mid 1800's.
