B: Its potential benefits seem to be greater than its costs.
Answer:
D). Culture; Support condition; independent.
Explanation:
As per the given description, 'culture' i.e. 'the dependent variable' which is characterized as 'subject variable' as it could not be adjusted or manipulated while 'the support conditions' could be manipulated or controlled in order to observe its impact on the dependent variable and thus, it is considered to be the 'independent variable'. 'Culture' is considered to be the 'dependent variable' as it is dependent on various other factors and represents the outcome of manipulation of the independent variable while the 'subject conditions' or the independent variable act as inputs to observe the impacts and reach worthy conclusions. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
She uses both lighting and explicit emotional description.
Explanation:
The writer describes the lightning of the places to emphasize certain emotions. First she starts by mentioning a "dimly lighted corridor", which creates a sensation of oppresion; then she describes an "empty dark cell", which the reader associates with fear and mystery. Furthermore, Rosa Parks continues the story by a sudden door slam, an action that makes the scene even more tense.
The narrator also states that the character's attempts at being nice didn't make her feel any better. This is a direct explanation of the main character's inner thoughts.
Answer: Britain
I think that’s the only logically answer to this question as India tried to get their independent from Great Britain
Answer:
1
The action of Pfizer is no way near an ethical act and was a clear violation of the ethical standards.This is true because
- As it is the company responsibility to act ethically to achieve the goals of the society by eradicating their problems and not by enhancing them hence the corporate social responsibility would not allow the company to behave inhumanly
- The duty based ethics would also empower the corporation to care and respect humanity
- Its is highly unethical on the part of Pfizer to conduct test on human life.if we consider the six basic guidelines to make ethical decisions then they have done it in a highly unethical manner.The six basic guidelines would never allow any company to behave i such a manner so as to risk the human life
Pfizer did not obey any of the above ethical standards and the conduct was clear violation of ethical standard.
2
Pfizer plc is not guilty of any ethical standard violation as it is a common practice for drug manufacturer to conduct tests on animals as well as human.And anyways the company conducted the tests on those human beings who will die with the epidermic which has already invaded the entire country of Nigeria.Hence in other to save/protect a large number of human being the test on the few persons is ethical as it is done to protect the society at large
So we cannot say that the company had violated any ethical standard
3
In order for Pfizer to avert the consequences of the violation then Pfizer should use the following five steps to create solution tom problem on ethical question these steps include
- Inquiry : It is very crucial to make initial inquiry about the entire subject matter
- Discussion: If there is a list of action generated after inquiry then discussion on every single action should be made
- Decision : It is highly crucial to take any decision with the consensus of all the participating candidates
- Justification : Each decision made must have a justification for the entire process
- Evaluation : it is highly crucial to evaluate the entire process
Explanation:
