Answer:
The statement "companies should not provide training to employees because it is the responsibility of individuals to possess the necessary knowledge and skills prior to becoming employed, is entirely wrong. In just one counter example of how this statement would not persist in work places is public service positions. Consistent demand is needed for public service employees. No college or educational program educates an individual on exact protocol on a specific public service field, further training is always required to provide top quality service. Also another example is in the food industry. Waitresses' or Waiters' responsibilities vary between different restaurants protocols and rules. Training is needed and required for someone to work in that specific restaurant, no one is able to "possess the necessary knowledge and skills prior to becoming employed" due to variety of rules, regulations, and preferences in work places.
Explanation:
This sentence should not be included because it is not explained why these organizations have a negative perspective.
<h3>What is paragraph 2 about?</h3>
Paragraph 2 focuses on the positive points or the benefits of vegetarianism. This idea is stated in "Many studies have found that vegetarianism has important health benefits".
<h3>Should the sentence be included?</h3>
The sentence presented states some health organizations have created a negative perspective about being vegetarian. This idea is indirectly related to the benefits of being vegetarian.
Moreover, this idea is not completely explained, for example, there are no reasons why these organizations have this perspective. Based on this, the sentence should not be included.
Note: This question is incomplete because the text has not been provided; here is the missing section:
(3) Many studies have found that vegetarianism has important health benefits. (4) For example, a vegetarian diet is connected to lower rates of heart disease and diabetes as well as lower cholesterol levels. (5) Some studies have also shown that cancer rates are lower in vegetarians than in meat-eaters and that vegetarians tend to live longer than nonvegetarians.
Learn more about perspective in: brainly.com/question/457192
Nash equilibrium is a set of strategies in which each player's strategy is considered as the best option for that player, based on the chosen strategy of their opponents.
<h3>What is a strategy?</h3>
A strategy refers to a set of guiding principles, actions, behavior, and decisions that a player strategically combines, so as to successfully achieve his or her goals, objectives, and possess a competitive advantage over opponents.
In game theory, it should be noted that Nash equilibrium is a set of strategies in which each player's strategy is considered as the best option for that player, based on the chosen strategy of their opponents.
Read more on Nash equilibrium here: brainly.com/question/17515037
#SPJ1
