Answer:
The ratio
is same for every pair of values.
Step-by-step explanation:
See the given graph.
The graph is a straight line which proves that the Rent in dollars is increasing at a constant rate with respect to time in Days. So, for a fixed change in time in Days, there will be a fixed change in the rent in Dollars.
Therefore, yes the function is proportional and the ratio
is same for every pair of values.
Hence, option 1 is correct.
I am not sure what the question is asking I am sorry could you please be more specific ?
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as:
(i.e. there is no difference between the SAT score for students in both locations)
(i.e. there is a difference between the SAT score for students in both locations)
The test statistics using the students' t-test for the two-samples; we have:






t = 2.06
degree of freedom = (
) -2
degree of freedom = (45+38) -2
degree of freedom = 81
Using the level of significance of 0.05
Since the test is two-tailed at the degree of freedom 81 and t = 2.06
The p-value = 0.0426
Decision rule: To reject
if the p-value is less than the significance level
Conclusion: We reject the
, thus, there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the SAT math score for students in Pennsylvania and Ohio.
Answer:
- bonds: $18,000
- stocks: $6,000
Step-by-step explanation:
You have a total of $24,000 invested in stocks and bonds in the ratio 1 : 3. You want to know the amount invested in each category.
<h3>Ratio</h3>
Recognizing that the total number of ratio units is 1+3 = 4, and that total represents $24,000, we see that each ratio unit represents $24,000/4 = $6,000.
Multiplying the ratio by $6,000, we see the investment amounts are ...
stocks : bonds = 1 : 3 = $6,000 : $18,000
$6,000 is invested in stocks; $18,000 is invested in bonds.
I believe the answer is 4.4