Answer:
Additional paid in capital decrease by 100 as a result of the acquisition
Explanation:
Treasury Stock 600 (100 shares x $6)
Additional Paid-In Capital 100 (100 shares x $1)
cash 1,000 (100 shares x $10)
Additional Paid-In Treasury Stock 300
The best ground on which the defendant ( Company S ) can dismiss the suit filed by the plaintiff (Company T) is the standing to sue.
<h3>What is standing to sue?</h3>
Standing to sue refers to a situation where the plaintiff who has filed the case must prove with appropriate proof of having damages or injuries in respect of the conduct of the defendant.
In the provided case, Company T has to prove that the products of Company S are actually defective through appropriate evidence. If Company T can't able to prove their alleged claim before the court, then the case is decided in the favor of the defendant party, that is, Company S.
Therefore, the standing to sue can be used as a ground by Company S for dismissing the claim of Company T.
Learn more about the standing to sue in the related link:
brainly.com/question/14820416
#SPJ4
Answer:
C. It considers fixed manufacturing overhead cost as product costs.
Explanation:
The statement that is true of absorption costing is that it considers fixed manufacturing overhead cost as product costs.
Absorption costing uses the concept of cost drivers to ascertain the quantum of fixed manufacturing overhead cost a product generates, and ties that fraction to the product as its own cost.
By so doing, what would ordinarily have been periodic costs that will be apportioned among products become fixed costs that are directly traceable to those products.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
$25 dollars because this is the highest valued alternative forfeited
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Total fixed costs= 300,000
Total costs= $450,000
Units= 120,000
A) Unitary variable cost= 150,000/120,000= $1.25
B) Units= 75,000
<u>The fixed costs remain constant no matter how many units are made (between relevant ranges).</u>
Total fixed costs= $300,000
C) UNits= 160,000
Total variable costs= 1.25*160,000= $200,000
D) Units= 180,000
Total fixed costs= 300,000
Total variable costs= 1.25*180,0000= 225,000
Total costs= $525,000
