Answer:
A. both Jonathan's and Joanna's cases
Explanation:
Legal implication: The term "legal implication" is described as a phenomenon that is considered as the consequences or results in which an individual in being involved something inappropriate according to the specific law. Legal implications can either be negative or positive.
Ethical implication: The term "ethical implication" is described as a phenomenon in which various matter is being considered based on an ethical viewpoint. It is considered as the human principle based on wrong and right.
In the question above, the correct answer is A.
Answer:
B. A government ruled by priests or religious leaders claiming a direct link to god.
Explanation:
A government in which a deity or god is recognised as the supreme ruling authority is recognised as the supreme ruling authority who gives guidance to humans that manage the day to day affairs of the government. In many theocracies the state's legal system is based on religious law, government leaders are also the members of the clergy. It was found in early civilisations. It ended with enlightenment but is still in some countries.
A presidential candidate can definitely vote for themselves. :)
<span>According to tesman, the slippers are so special to him because </span><span>his aunt made them for him.
Tesman was really fond of his aunt and the slippers are a really precious object for him because it filled with memories about his aunt. He even became aggressive if he heard someone mentioned something negative about the slippers</span>