Some believed that the Constitution did not give the new federal government the ability to restrict inherent rights, so no list of those rights was necessary. Others worried that if the rights were listed, they would invariably forget some and the list would ever be incomplete. Finally, the argument was that the states each had their own constitutions, too, and that rights were best protected at a state level.
I believe the answer would be the second choice.
<span>Sharing a small living space with family
members. During the industrial revolution, people from the countryside came to
cities in multitudes looking for greener pastures by obtaining jobs in
factories. For this reason, the family members had to live together in small
spaces.</span>
About 360,000 births per day