1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yakvenalex [24]
3 years ago
8

Under the Articles of Confederation, why didn't the federal government enforce the laws?

History
2 answers:
dimaraw [331]3 years ago
5 0
They had no way to enforce the laws. the states had too much power. the federal government couldn't tax- they could only ask the states for money. they also didn't have the power to draft people into a federal army
svlad2 [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. The States had the power to enforce the national laws

Explanation:

Sorry if wrong ^-^"

You might be interested in
The indus river valley specialize in creating "seals" for signing contracts and documents
jarptica [38.1K]
That statement is true
<span> These square seals, carved in intaglio with geometric or animal motifs, served as economic documentation. 
</span>The indus river valley citizen used these seals to mark the trading agreements that they made in bartering different resources between one tribe/individual with another.
7 0
3 years ago
Is declaring war a federal government, state government, or both?
Triss [41]

Federal government

A state can't go to war.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Napoleon overthrew the government of ______
motikmotik

Answer:

Napoleon was overtrhrew the government of France

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. A country with very strong economic ties to the United States is allowing
exis [7]

Answer:

C because you don’t want to initiate a military response at first and public protests won’t work because it is a different country and diplomatic talks are a good first action because the other country leader might not know what is happening or might be willing to make the rights violations stop.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The fall of the Roman Empire was not due to one event but due to many events combined.
KatRina [158]

Answer:

There wasn't a single thing that brought Rome to its knees, but instead a dastardly combination of several factors. At the source of everything, the Roman government was incredibly corrupt and ineffective, and Roman citizens did not trust in the leaders of the Republic. In addition, the rise of Christianity and the shying away from the Roman polytheistic religious traditions also contributed, as the latter viewed the emperor as having deistic authority. Finally, because of the sheer size of the Empire, it was incredibly hard to govern on the fringes and the Roman Empire spent too much money bolstering its military might.

Explanation:

hope it helps

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the postwar period difficult for farmers?
    7·2 answers
  • What kind of lives did Calvinists lead? Why?
    6·1 answer
  • Based based on this excerpt from the text in what way would interchangeable parts best help business
    11·1 answer
  • Groups of people who traveled the Silk Road together for safety.
    9·2 answers
  • What was the miracle at dunkirk? Why was it considered a miracle ?
    15·1 answer
  • a circular stage has a radius of 8ft.Flynn wants to paint a red line along the edge of the stage. He calculates its approximate
    10·1 answer
  • Which New Deal program provided economic help for elderly and retired people?
    10·2 answers
  • Helpp with all three !! will give brainliest
    13·1 answer
  • 2.Who is historian ?​
    12·2 answers
  • How many times do people lose their phones or other things
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!