Answer:
Its probably A
Explanation:
I don't really think that any of those arguments are actually good. However, answer B is wrong because political parties won't necessarily lose financial support if somebody votes against them. it also doesn't really fit as an argument to why you should vote even though the other party will probably win. Number C is not logical because you don't just strt parties because the party you support loses. That way all the existing parties will lose votes and not only the ones you are against. Answer D is just a very bad argument. Think about, would you change where you proably live all your life just because they have more influence on the vote? What about your job, friends and family. And if they mean for you to fly or ride to another state just to vote and then come back, that bad too because it's expensive.
Answer:
C. During this time our food production has grown even faster than our population.
Explanation:
Hello! The correct answer in the statement it’s option C. The market in the United States grew vertiginously in recent years, being one of the most developed food producers in the world for half a century. This advance exceeds the growth of its population by far.
Thanks for your question! Feel free to ask more!
Loyalist- they were loyal to England and often had higher wages, jobs and didn’t feel the need to revolt
