Answer:
True
Explanation:
The ability to process information and multi-task continues to diminish with every drink.
Hope this helps!
Feel free to ask if you have anymore questions!
The beliefs, philosophies, and norms that a company explicitly states are espoused values.
Espoused values are values expressed on behalf of the organization or attributed to it by its senior management in public statements such as annual reports.
Espoused Values represent how people in the organization believe things should be. They are what they say is important and meaningful to them. Shared Basic Assumptions are the most profound and most hidden level of beliefs and values that are so commonplace that no one ever talks about them.
Hence, the correct answer is "D".
To know more about espoused values, click here.
#SPJ4
In college of Utah driving-simulation experiments, college students speaking on mobile telephones have been slower to stumble on and reply to visitors signals. This first-rate illustrates. selective interest.
The required details for Selective attention in given paragraph
Selective interest refers to the procedures that permit an character to pick out and recognition on unique enter for in addition processing whilst concurrently suppressing inappropriate or distracting information. Selective interest lets in adults to recognition on task-applicable information, whilst ignoring task-inappropriate information. This in flip ends in advanced processing of task-applicable information.
Factors like spatial proximity, cues that control the spatial volume of attentional recognition, salience of goals in addition to the distractors, and perceptual grouping among the goal and the distractors must be taken into consideration whilst explaining the selective manage of interest.
To know about Selective attention click here
brainly.com/question/4122584
#SPJ4
This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).
B any mga gambit ng Niyog
