<span>semantic fallacy
</span>
A “slam dunk” argument is likely the product of a fallacious syllogism. The word “slam dunk” has actually originated from the basketball games. This word is used to show people a forceful move in the game of basketball. The player puts the ball in the basket with full power and force. It is often considered a dramatic shot in the game. In literary sense, the word can be used to express violent actions as well. It can also be used to describe a vicious fight among individuals. <span> </span>
In one understanding, each of them have a verb phrase, as a verb phrase can involve a verb and it's dependencies so all of them have a verb phrase:
<span>A. The crowd<em> </em><em>roared as the bull charged.</em>
B. June <em>was a collector of memorabilia.</em>
C. I <em>shall be all that I am and more.</em>
D. I <em>believed every word he said.
</em>
Sometimes, a verb phrase is seen in a very strict sense; a s verb and parts, such as auxiliary verbs. Then the correct answer is
</span>
<span>C. I shall be all that I am and more.
Then the correct answer is "shall be" - C
</span>
<span>The correct answer is III. The author's purpose is the reason why a text has been written, which usually falls under one of three categories: persuade, inform, entertain. Other forms of purpose usually fall under one of these. Examining the details of the text, for example, the type of language used and any accompanying images will help a reader work out the author's purpose. </span>
I don't believe a or b is the answer so i would eliminate those 2
