A nonrestrictive modifier adds information that is not essential for the reader to understand the sentence. In case the nonrestrictive modifier is eliminated, the meaning would remain the same. Only nonrestrictive modifiers are separated by commas. Taking this into account, the sentences that contain correctly punctuated nonrestrictive modifiers are:
- My oldest sister, Maria, is a pilot - If we remove <em>Maria</em>, we can still identify which sister we are talking about.
- My two best friends, Tory and Monica, met me at the movies - If we remove <em>Tory and Monica</em>, we can still identify which two people we are referring to.
- Bulldogs, which I love, are the cutest! - If we remove <em>which I love</em>, we can still identify which dogs we are talking about.
Hello. You did not include the passage to which the question refers, which prevents me from showing you the fallacies that the text may contain. However, to help you, I will show you how to identify fallacies and how they weaken a text's arguments. I hope this helped.
Fallacies are arguments that a person presents as true and logical, but they are false and present statements that are not consistent with reality, unprovable and flawed, that emit inaccurate and incorrect information. The fallacies leave the arguments with a fanciful, inconsequential and illogical content, since it has a flawed content and it is not possible to admire and agree.
An example of fallacy occurs with the phrase "my neighbor was bitten by a pitbul, so all pitbuls in the neighborhood must be euthanized as they are dangerous."
ABBA. Sky and lie would be A. Air and fair would be B. Therefore... Sky (A), Air (B), Fair (B), Lie (A), would make ABBA.
The effect of the figurative language used in this excerpt are as follows:
It shows Hamlet’s indecision.
It shows Hamlet’s confusion.
It shows Hamlet’s idleness.
Answer:
The inaugural ceremony is a defining moment in a President’s career, and no one knew this better than John F. Kennedy as he prepared for his own inauguration on January 20, 1961. He wanted his address to be short and clear—devoid of any partisan rhetoric and focused on foreign policy. He began constructing the speech in late November, working with friends and advisers. While his colleagues submitted ideas, the speech was distinctly the work of Kennedy himself. Aides recount that every sentence was worked, reworked, and reduced. It was a meticulously crafted piece of oratory that dramatically announced a generational change in the White House and called on the nation to combat “tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.”
Kennedy wrote his thoughts in his nearly indecipherable longhand on a yellow legal pad. The climax of the speech and its most memorable phrase, “Ask not what your country can
do for you—ask what you can do for your country,” was honed down from a thought about sacrifice that Kennedy had long held in his mind and had expressed in various ways in campaign speeches.
Explanation:
hope its correct but you have lots of John F. Kennedy questions