Oh no.
Okay so first lets talk about what stereotypes are. Stereotypes are essentially what society has made as the “commonality” of the populations of certain races, social groups and social tendencies.
Okay, now that that is out of the way:
The media sometimes stereotypes groups of people based on something most people don’t think about; that being Political groups. For example, CNN and FOX news have really bad habits of talking about the “stereotypical” conservative or the “stereotypical” democrat. If you pay attention to certain clips from these stations, you will see stereotyping as well as less than friendly conversations involving politics.
Next up, who benefits? Well, people who want the attention frankly. People can use stereotypes to actually make a point or to even further disprove stereotypes.
Who is harmed? People of color. That is kind of the obvious answer unfortunately. People of color have stereotypes that don’t put them in the best light. Frankly, I find it biased and not true, however people sometimes believe in these stereotypes. So sometimes these stereotypes can harm the people of color.
Finally, how does it affect the political sphere? People are labeled and the political sphere becomes more radicalized. When stereotypes are pushed forward and when people believe it, ideas become radicalized. This is NOT good, radical opinions often bring hatred and EXTREME bias with them.
Hope that helps and good morning!!!
They are elected within each party.
<span>
</span>
Victims - were the people directly involved. (so not this)
Target - loose term which might mean a certain group of people or someone in particular. (maybe correct)
Intent - What the terrorist tried to achieve. (probably not)
Motive - Why he justified his actions (no)
Best answer would likely be target (B).
Try doing this. (Type the definition for Inuit, Anasaz, and Northw Coast. It will help you understand a lot! If it doesn't then come back and I will try again and figure it out! :)
On November 9, the news networks announced that Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (states in which Hillary Clinton led in the polls) gave the last 30 voters to define the winner to Donald Trump, who became the forty-fifth president of the United States. . Clinton accepted the defeat against Trump, who won the 2016 presidential election with 304 electoral votes against Clinton's 227.1 The states that gave him (against most predictions) Trump's victory were, mainly, the states industrialists of the Great Lakes region: Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. In addition to these, the Republican candidate also managed to prevail in the two major states in dispute, or "swing states", of recent decades: Ohio and Florida, and in other minor "swing" states such as Arizona, Georgia, Iowa and Carolina. North. Clinton, on the other hand, took over contested states such as Colorado, Nevada, Virginia and New Hampshire.
Therefore, the Republican candidate Trump won the elections, despite having obtained the support of 2.8 million voters less than his Democratic rival. As data scientist Azhar Hamdan points out, in the end the 2016 elections were not decided by that advantage of almost three million votes from Hillary Clinton, but rather the narrower advantage of just 78,000 votes that Trump achieved in three counties of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania
