1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astra-53 [7]
3 years ago
10

President george washington principal reason for issuing the proclamation of neutrality 1793 was to

History
1 answer:
Strike441 [17]3 years ago
3 0
<span>The principal reason for issuing the proclamation of neutrality 1793 was to safeguard the newly won independence.
</span>The proclamation of neutrality was issued on <span> April 22, </span>1793 that proclaimed the country unbiased in the contention amongst France and Great Britain and i<span>t also threatened that there will be legal proceedings against any American who is providing any assistance to any country at war.</span><span>

</span>
You might be interested in
Why did Major George Washington and his troops surrender at Fort Necessity?
ASHA 777 [7]
Jumonville's murder in captivity incited a strong French response, and Washington was unable to defend his makeshift Fort Necessity from French forces led by Jumonville's half-brother. Washington surrendered on July 4 and signed a confession—in French, which he could not read—to Jumonville's assassination.
6 0
3 years ago
Look at the map of the Cumberland Road. Map of the Cumberland Road. Why was the construction of the Cumberland Road in 1818 cont
slava [35]

Answer: the answer is c aka Some people thought it was unfair to use federal money to build a road that would only benefit a small number of Americans.

Explanation:

fresh of the test

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these reasons desicrbe why spain was motivated to compete with portugal?<br>​
Softa [21]
Answer:where is the question or picture
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did many jews move to poland?
Dafna11 [192]
<span>A. they were persecuted in Europe</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What impact did the oil industry have on transportation in the United States
Andreyy89

Answer:

North America is experiencing a boom in crude oil supply, primarily due to growing production in the Canadian oil sands and the recent expansion of shale oil production from the Bakken fields in North Dakota and Montana as well as the Eagle Ford and Permian Basins in Texas. Taken together, these new supplies are fundamentally changing the U.S. oil supply-demand balance. The United States now meets 66% of its crude oil demand from production in North America, displacing imports from overseas and positioning the United States to have excess oil and refined products supplies in some regions.

The rapid expansion of North American oil production has led to significant challenges in transporting crudes efficiently and safely to domestic markets—principally refineries—using the nation’s legacy pipeline infrastructure. In the face of continued uncertainty about the prospects for additional pipeline capacity, and as a quicker, more flexible alternative to new pipeline projects, North American crude oil producers are increasingly turning to rail as a means of transporting crude supplies to U.S. markets. Railroads are more willing to enter into shorter-term contracts with shippers than pipelines, offering more flexibility in a volatile oil market. According to rail industry officials, U.S. freight railroads delivered 435,560 carloads of crude oil in 2013 (roughly equivalent to 300 million barrels), compared to 9,500 carloads in 2008. In the first half of 2014, 258,541 carloads of crude oil were delivered. Crude imports by rail from Canada have increased more than 20-fold since 2011. The amount of oil transported by rail may also be influenced by a tight market for U.S.-built tankers. However, if recent oil price declines persist and the price falls below the level at which Bakken producers can cover their costs, some production could be shut in, potentially reducing the volume of oil carried by rail.

While oil by rail has demonstrated benefits with respect to the efficient movement of oil from producing regions to market hubs, it has also raised significant concerns about transportation safety and potential impacts to the environment. The most recent data available indicate that railroads consistently spill less crude oil per ton-mile transported than other modes of land transportation. Nonetheless, safety and environmental concerns have been underscored by a series of major accidents across North America involving crude oil transportation by rail—including a catastrophic fire that caused numerous fatalities and destroyed much of Lac Mégantic, Quebec, in 2013. Following that event, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a safety alert warning that the type of crude oil being transported from the Bakken region may be more flammable than traditional heavy crude oil.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose of the poll tax?
    7·2 answers
  • Two words, eighteen letters, one space, the first letter of each word is capitalized
    8·1 answer
  • Mark each statement if it describes a characteristic or use of a Romanesque church.
    11·2 answers
  • How is Paper Money different in every country? Comprehension question! I need help! Someone please.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes the purpose of propaganda?
    9·1 answer
  • What happens to trees from one life zone to the next?
    8·1 answer
  • Tensions leading up to world war 2 can be traced to which of the following
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Charles V divide the Hapsburg Empire?
    15·1 answer
  • This my final help a kid out pls
    12·1 answer
  • What role did the Etruscans play in Rome’s early development?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!