Answer:
Right up front.
And also, this does not belong in the English section.
Last time, I urged for more spontaneous public conversation and unscripted statements as a way to end the post.
Several readers responded to this appeal for spontaneity by writing in to ask how one may "learn to improvise." Should we not plan as much and instead focus on being more spontaneous if speaking "off the cuff" makes us appear honest and genuine?
Even though I had intended to write on something quite different this week, these inquiries brought me back to this subject. I'll thus attempt to clarify the connection between preparation and the capacity to vary from one's "script" in this post and maybe the one after that.
I would like to make two issues clear in relation to my opinions on improvisation.
To start, I want to be clear about how I'm using the phrase. I'm referring about improvisation, which is the ability to change one's planned statements in response to the situation, especially while interacting with the audience. This kind of spontaneity occurs when a speaker is comfortable enough with the speech to decide to modify the intended wording or take a new direction mid-speech, as Martin Luther King did in his "I have a dream" address. This phenomena is distinct from what I refer to as pure improvisation. Naturally, when I discuss public speaking, I do not mean the kind of Pure improvisation in "improv theatre," in which actors make up scenes on the fly using just audience members' random thoughts and phrases with no prior planning.
My second explanation is as follows: The type of improvisation I recommend for speakers only occurs when the orator has mastered the subject at hand via several hours of deliberate preparation. The finest improvisers I've encountered were typically the presenters who prepared the most in- depthly.
Learn more about spontaneity brainly.com/question/28180293
#SPJ4
The most common knowledge about the Grand Canyon is that although this place is beautiful, it is a difficult environment to walk and to find resources such as water and food. This is proven by Lopez de Cardenass's description.
<h3>How does Lopez de Cardenas describe the Grand Canyon?</h3>
- He claims the location is irregular.
- He claims that the terrain has descents impossible to be conquered by humans.
- He highlights the lack of qualified water to be consumed.
- He highlights the lack of safe food for consumption.
- It shows how extremely cold the place is.
- It shows that the environment is beautiful, but it makes life difficult for humans.
The Grand Canyon is a very beautiful and admired place all over the world. This beauty is what makes the environment known and a great tourist spot for those who wish to observe beautiful landscapes. However, it is common for us to realize that this place is a great challenge for those who want to walk and settle in it, due to its irregular surface, with extremely uneven terrain. In addition, the climate and natural resources of the place are not favorable.
This type of knowledge is confirmed by the report by Lopez de Cardenas, who emphasizes that in addition to the difficult terrain, the lack of potable water in the place and the cold climate are very challenging.
You can see Lopez de Cardenass's account in the article "Boulders Taller than the great tower of Serville"
Learn more about the Grand Canyon at the link:
brainly.com/question/6561507
#SPJ1
I believe you’re talking about a prepositional phrase. Ex: On the table, in the kitchen.
