1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rodikova [14]
3 years ago
15

Which was the following was a pull factor that caused the Dutch to explore the indies

History
1 answer:
MariettaO [177]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is A) the desire to profit from the trade of pepper and other species found in the Indies.

The other options of the question were B) the desire to increase the size of the Dutch population in Europe. C) the need to find an alternate source of food following a great famine in Europe. D) the need to protect military outposts in West Africa.

What was a pull factor that caused the Dutch to explore the Indies was the desire to profit from the trade of pepper and other species found in the Indies.

As was the case with other European superpowers, the Dutch were interested in colonizing new territories to exploit them and increase the wealth of the Dutch crown. They explored the Indies and they discovered places such as the Dutch Indies, modern-day Indonesia, and established a colony there. They found a place with natural resources and raw materials that they exploited from 1816 to 1949.

You might be interested in
Who helped win the battle of Saratoga?
Anestetic [448]

Answer:

general John Burgoyne

Explanation:

I hope this is correct

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(WILL GIVE BRAINLY TO WHOEVER IS RIGHT!) Select the correct answer.
Anastasy [175]

Answer:

Explanation:

A) Bush V. Gore was about a presidential election dispute.

B) Gideon V. Wainwright was about not being able to afford someone to represent you.

C) Miranda V. Arizona enforced the Miranda Rights.

D) United States V. Nixon was about the affair in which they ordered tape recordings to be used in court.

None of these seem correct to the answer as Marbury v. Madison seems a much better choice. If I had to chose, I'd probably choose B or C.

3 0
2 years ago
Imperialism points and counterpoints
marta [7]

Answer & Explanation:

The anti-imperialists opposed the expansion because they believed imperialism violated the credo of republicanism, especially the need for "consent of the governed". ... We hold that the policy known as imperialism is hostile to liberty and tends toward militarism, an evil from which it has been our glory to be free.

i looked it up ok

4 0
3 years ago
Who said the president created by the constitution is really just a king
frutty [35]

Answer: Federalists vs. Antifederalists

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP
kaheart [24]

Answer:

Statement 1 is false

Explanation:

King George III could not take away our President because, at the time, we did not have one. The very office and, in fact, the entire American government, had not yet been created.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Identify Old stone age
    8·1 answer
  • "list three major ways england’s war for empire impacted the colonies in north america."
    13·2 answers
  • This treaty divided the world into spheres of influence of exploration between the Portuguese and Spanish. (Need Answer Fast)
    13·1 answer
  • Named the pacific ocean​
    13·2 answers
  • How did governments change in Europe from the 1600s-1700s?
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes a religious difference between the New England and middle colonies?
    12·1 answer
  • Articles of confederation
    12·1 answer
  • The War Powers Act (1973) was passed mainly in response to a concern
    12·1 answer
  • How did the English bills of rights limit the power of the monarch ?
    11·1 answer
  • Nguyễn ái quốc rời cảng nhà rồng năng bao nhiêu tuổi?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!