Answer:
Explanation:
A) Bush V. Gore was about a presidential election dispute.
B) Gideon V. Wainwright was about not being able to afford someone to represent you.
C) Miranda V. Arizona enforced the Miranda Rights.
D) United States V. Nixon was about the affair in which they ordered tape recordings to be used in court.
None of these seem correct to the answer as Marbury v. Madison seems a much better choice. If I had to chose, I'd probably choose B or C.
Answer & Explanation:
The anti-imperialists opposed the expansion because they believed imperialism violated the credo of republicanism, especially the need for "consent of the governed". ... We hold that the policy known as imperialism is hostile to liberty and tends toward militarism, an evil from which it has been our glory to be free.
i looked it up ok
Answer: Federalists vs. Antifederalists
Explanation:
Answer:
Statement 1 is false
Explanation:
King George III could not take away our President because, at the time, we did not have one. The very office and, in fact, the entire American government, had not yet been created.