Answer:
1. S 2. P 3. S 4. S
In the second exercise insert the following between the sentences:
5. ,but (comma before but)
6. ,and (comma before and)
7. : (just put semicolon)
8. ,or (comma before or)
Explanation:
There’s not a picture when there should be so I don’t think anybody can help you unless you repost with a picture
Answer:good for you
Explanation:This sentence cant be changed into passive voice. HAVE is a non acting verb, this means other verb must be present in the sentence in order to change it into a passive voice. for example; "The car is being had by me" is grammatically incorrect sentence.
Answer:
Although he studied, he still failed.
The stationery and jewelry were displayed at the show.
Explanation:
China's social credit system has been compared to Black Mirror, Big Brother and every other dystopian future sci-fi writers can think up. The reality is more complicated — and in some ways, worse.
The idea for social credit came about back in 2007, with projects announced by the government as an opt-in system in 2014. But there's a difference between the official government system and private, corporate versions, though the latter's scoring system that includes shopping habits and friendships is often conflated with the former.
Brits are well accustomed to credit checks: data brokers such as Experian trace the timely manner in which we pay our debts, giving us a score that's used by lenders and mortgage providers. We also have social-style scores, and anyone who has shopped online with eBay has a rating on shipping times and communication, while Uber drivers and passengers both rate each other; if your score falls too far, you're out of luck.
China's social credit system expands that idea to all aspects of life, judging citizens' behaviour and trustworthiness. Caught jaywalking, don't pay a court bill, play your music too loud on the train — you could lose certain rights, such as booking a flight or train ticket. "The idea itself is not a Chinese phenomenon," says Mareike Ohlberg, research associate at the Mercator Institute for China Studies. Nor is the use, and abuse, of aggregated data for analysis of behaviour. "But if [the Chinese system] does come together as envisioned, it would still be something very unique," she says. "It's both unique and part of a global trend."
