1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
3 years ago
7

When would the government be allowed to limit what people say?

History
2 answers:
svetoff [14.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

  When it has a clear intention of provoking violence.

Explanation:

  Freedom of speech is one of the most important rights a democracy must have to be considered a good one. But this not mean that everyone can say what it wants about others. If you say a lie there will be consequences. The right supports the freedom of a person or a community to articulate their ideas or opinions without fear of retaliation.

  Nevertheless, the importance that this right has for democracy, there are some limitations to it. Particularly when the right enters in conflict with other rights and freedoms. If you give a public speech supporting the murder of a person or community you will be committing a crime and therefore the government would have the power to limit your sayings.

  I hope this answer helps you.

soldier1979 [14.2K]3 years ago
3 0
Occasionally, a government sees itself as being justified in limiting what people say in times of emergency, since they think that free speech during such times can harm the country. 
You might be interested in
How were bones used during the shang dynasty to predict the future
Dafna11 [192]
Oracle bones were used during the Shang dynasty to predict the future. The bones were used to process fortune-telling. They were used by Shamans, religious consultants that collaborated with gods and mythical people. The Shamans used the bone's cracks to demonstrate patterns or blemishes to anticipate the future. 
3 0
3 years ago
Under the Articles of Confederation, on whom did the Confederation Congress rely to enforce its laws?
xz_007 [3.2K]

<em>A.  Individual states.</em>

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution for the United States. They were known for being very weak and giving little to no power to the government, only to the states. Under the Articles, the government could not tax the states, regulate trade, create and enforce laws properly, draft soldiers, and other important aspects of what a government needs to do.

Since most of the power went to the states, it was very hard to do anything. The Confederation Congress relied on the states in order to enforce any laws and 9 out of 13 of the states had to agree with it.

Eventually, people started to realize how the Articles of Confederation was doing more harm than good and was potentially harming the country. The people who believed in this and wanted to amend the Articles were called Federalists. On the other hand, people who were in support of the Articles and wanted the power to be in the hands of the states were called Anti-Federalists.

When the<em> Constitutional Convention of 1787</em> was called, the original goal was to amend the Articles of Confederation. This did not happen though. The Articles actually ended up getting scrapped altogether and the United States Constitution was created instead.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Think back to media coverage of the Vietnam War. Which best describes why the Tet Offensive is often pinpointed as an event that
kherson [118]
A, because at this time, Walter Cronkite delivered his famous "unwinnable war" speech B. because the coverage of the war became a great deal more objective C. because, after a long time coming, media coverage became extremely graphic D. because, after a long policy of not commenting on the war, Lyndon B. Johnson spoke out against the media E. because the controversial image of a U.S.-ally general shooting a communist was broadcast, beginning a trend away from upbeat coverage of the war

Hope I helped? ^ω^

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do nations form alliances? Give examples of different kinds of alliances and explain their purposes.
Goryan [66]
Nations form alliances in order to achieve goals that otherwise wouldn't be possible. For example, NATO, or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, a coalition of countries in North America and Europe, agree to defend one another in case of attack from an outside party. This is clearly beneficial, because this intergovernmental support both makes an outside attack less probable, and if it occurs, easier to handle. Another example is NAFTA, or the North American Free Trade Agreement. Shared among Canada, the US, and Mexico, this alliance eradicated trade barriers within these countries. Another beneficial alliance, this agreement increases international trade due to lower costs and thus improves the international economy.
Hope I Helped :) 

- Hind 
5 0
3 years ago
What was the environment like during the Klondike Gold Rush? Explore two or three different Internet sources to create a mini-re
notka56 [123]

Answer: The Klondike Gold Rush is credited for helping the United States out of a depression. Still, it had a horrific impact on the local environment, causing massive soil erosion, water contamination, deforestation and loss of native wildlife, among other things. The gold rush also severely impacted the Native people.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The map shows the British Isles. Which country became the dominant power on the islands after the Norman Conquest? Scotland Irel
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes Washington's Barefoot Schoolboy Law?
    13·2 answers
  • When you daydream, you are able to escape deary situations and enter into a more pleasant place. Imagination is the key to creat
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me I have less than 30 min to answer
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following philosophies directly contributed to the start of the Enlightenment in the 17th century?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following developments led to an increase in european exploration
    7·2 answers
  • If the supply curve shifts to the left the market equilibrium price will __________.
    10·2 answers
  • Which best describes a Change in Japan since world war 2
    14·1 answer
  • if Japan never would have attacked Pearl Harbor do you believe the US ever would have entered World War II? Explain in at least
    6·1 answer
  • According to R.R. Palmer, what was ONE CHANGE made under Napoleon in order to fix the economy of France?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!