Answer:
ok
Explanation:
The main difference to me is that Romeo's "love" in Act I, Scene 1 is a sad love because it is not returned by Rosaline. You can argue that it is less mature as well. The event that occurred to make Romeo feel unhappy in this act is that Rosaline does not love him as he loves her.
By Act II, Scene 2, Romeo's love is returned, this time by Juliet. He is now happy. This is because he met Juliet at the dance and she clearly loved him as he loved her.
To me, the main linguistic device that Shakespeare uses to contrast the two emotions is seen in what Romeo compares the women to. Rosaline is compared to the moon, which is pale and cold. Juliet is compared to the sun which is warm and bright and which drives the moon away.
The event that caused Romeo to feel this way for Juliet is totally and completely the visual sight of her and the reaction that happens within him upon seeing her beauty. He was instantly mesmerized.
Upon Juliet's returning love, I believe both audiences believe their circumstance to be at the very least infatuation because we see that puppy love in teenagers all the time. That attraction is very physical, emotional and as Juliet comments, "too rash, too sudden, [and] too ill-advised".
Answer:
Explanation:
⁜He swims well.
⁜He ran quickly.
⁜She spoke softly.
⁜James coughed loudly to attract her attention.
⁜He plays the flute beautifully. (after the direct object)
⁜He ate the chocolate cake greedily. (after the direct object)
Answer:The plans are made for Augustus, Hazel, and Hazel's mother to go to Amsterdam, but when Hazel and Augustus meet Van Houten they find that, instead of a prolific genius, he is a mean-spirited drunk who claims he cannot answer any of Hazel’s questions. The two leave Van Houten’s in utter disappointment, and accompanied by Lidewij, who feels horrified by Van Houten's behavior, they tour Anne Frank’s house. At the end of the tour, Augustus and Hazel share a romantic kiss, to the applause of spectators. They head back to the hotel where they make love for the first and only time. The following day, Augustus confesses that while Hazel was in the ICU he had a body scan which revealed his cancer has returned and spread everywhere. They return to Indianapolis, and Hazel realizes Augustus is now the grenade. As his condition worsens he is less prone to his typical charm and confidence. He becomes vulnerable and scared, but is still a beautiful boy in Hazel’s mind. As this change occurs, she ceases calling him Augustus and starts referring to him as just Gus, as his parents do. Hazel recognizes that she loves him now as much as ever. Augustus’s condition deteriorates quickly. In his final days Augustus arranges a prefuneral for himself, and Isaac and Hazel give eulogies. Hazel steals a line from Van Houten about larger and smaller infinities. She says how much she loves Augustus, and that she would not trade their short time together for anything in the world.Augustus dies eight days later. Hazel is astonished to find Van Houten at the funeral. Van Houten explains that he and Gus maintained correspondence and that Augustus demanded Van Houten make up for ruining the trip to Amsterdam by coming to his funeral to see Hazel. Van Houten abstractly reveals the fate of Anna’s mother, but Hazel is not interested. A few days later Isaac informs Hazel that Augustus was writing something for her. He had hinted about writing a sequel to An Imperial Affliction for her, and as Hazel scrambles to locate the pages she encounters Van Houten once more. He drunkenly reveals that Anna was the name of his daughter. She died of cancer when she was eight, and An Imperial Affliction was his literary attempt at reconciling himself with her death. Hazel tells Van Houten to sober up and write another book.
Answer:
Both conventional public beliefs and existing academic research on colorism presuppose that variation in skin color predicts social outcomes among minorities but is inconsequential among whites. The authors draw on social psychological research on stereotyping to suggest that in quick, low information decisions such as an arrest, the opposite may be true. Contrary to findings for longer term socioeconomic outcomes, the authors find that black men’s probability of arrest remains constant across the spectrum of skin color, while white men’s probability of arrest decreases continuously with lighter skin. Beyond posing an exception to the modern conception of colorism, these results have implications for efforts to ameliorate the epidemic of incarceration among black men, as well as for understanding how elements of visible phenotype may serve as a unique category of predictors in models of social inequality.
Explanation:
ur aren't showing a picture but the answer is in the top..
Answer:
B. A message about the human condition that people, regardless of differences, understand on personal level.
Explanation: